Maldonado Thomas S
Division of Vascular Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;20(4):205-15. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.10.002.
Determination of degree of carotid artery stenosis is of critical importance when deciding whether a patient warrants surgical intervention. While angiography is still considered by some to be the true reference standard for imaging the internal carotid artery (ICA), physicians rely most commonly on duplex imaging when planning for endarterectomy. It is noninvasive, safe, and overall reliable for grading stenosis but is nevertheless user-dependent and can be limited in cases of severe calcification. Moreover, a lack of consensus for duplex criteria can be confounding. In recent years, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have assumed a more prominent role in the preoperative planning for treatment of carotid stenosis. Improved resolution and faster acquisition times for both of these imaging modalities have allowed for accurate depictions of degree of stenosis, as well as plaque characterization. CTA and MRA may have special relevance in the era of carotid stenting, since challenging arch anatomy and identification of a high-risk vulnerable plaque may be useful when deciding whether to perform a stent procedure or endarterectomy.
在决定患者是否需要手术干预时,确定颈动脉狭窄程度至关重要。虽然有些人仍认为血管造影是成像颈内动脉(ICA)的真正参考标准,但医生在计划进行内膜切除术时最常依赖双功超声成像。它是非侵入性的、安全的,并且在狭窄分级方面总体可靠,但它仍然依赖于使用者,并且在严重钙化的情况下可能会受到限制。此外,双功超声标准缺乏共识可能会造成混淆。近年来,磁共振血管造影(MRA)和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)在颈动脉狭窄治疗的术前规划中发挥了更突出的作用。这两种成像方式分辨率的提高和采集时间的加快,使得能够准确描绘狭窄程度以及斑块特征。CTA和MRA在颈动脉支架置入时代可能具有特殊意义,因为在决定是否进行支架手术或内膜切除术时,具有挑战性的主动脉弓解剖结构和识别高危易损斑块可能会有所帮助。