Suppr超能文献

安全的颈动脉内膜切除术:“一刀切”策略

Safe carotid endarterectomy: "one fits all strategy".

作者信息

Unlu Ahmet, Durukan Ahmet Baris

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Park Usak Hospital, Usak, Turkey.

出版信息

Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2020 Sep;17(3):137-142. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2020.99077. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more in the extracranial internal carotid artery is responsible for 10-15% of all strokes. Interventional treatment options include carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting, where endarterectomy is proven to be superior.

AIM

In this study, we report the carotid endarterectomy results of patients we operated on using the strategy we termed the "one fits all strategy".

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy between July 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively studied. Conventional endarterectomy under general anesthesia with primary closure of the arteriotomy was performed in all patients. We used a near infrared spectroscopy oximeter to measure regional cerebral oxygenation continuously throughout the surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 70.96 8.15 years. There were 52 male and 24 female patients. The mean follow-up time was 20.6 ±13.6 months. Coronary artery disease was detected in 52 (73.6%) patients. Coronary artery bypass operation was indicated in 19 patients in whom a staged approach was performed in 13 and a reverse staged approach in 1. There were two perioperative strokes one of which recovered fully spontaneously and the other partially with physiotherapy. Eight cases were revised due to hematoma formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy continues to prove its safety in carotid artery stenosis patients. Continuous cerebral oxygenation monitoring is indispensable for carotid surgery. Despite discrepancies in surgical techniques, we believe that "one fits all strategy: general anesthesia, conventional endarterectomy without patch plasty, never shunter and always NIRS monitorization" may be used safely in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

摘要

引言

颅外颈内动脉狭窄50%或以上是所有中风病例的10 - 15%的病因。介入治疗选择包括颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术,其中已证实内膜切除术更具优势。

目的

在本研究中,我们报告了采用我们称为“一刀切策略”对患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。

材料与方法

回顾性研究了2016年7月至2020年4月期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术的76例患者。所有患者均在全身麻醉下进行传统内膜切除术并对动脉切开处进行一期缝合。我们在整个手术过程中使用近红外光谱血氧仪持续测量局部脑氧合。

结果

患者的平均年龄为70.96±8.15岁。男性患者52例,女性患者24例。平均随访时间为20.6±13.6个月。52例(73.6%)患者检测出冠状动脉疾病。19例患者需要进行冠状动脉搭桥手术,其中13例采用分期手术,1例采用逆向分期手术。围手术期发生两例中风,其中一例完全自发恢复,另一例经物理治疗部分恢复。8例因血肿形成而进行了修复手术。

结论

颈动脉内膜切除术在颈动脉狭窄患者中继续证明了其安全性。持续脑氧合监测对于颈动脉手术不可或缺。尽管手术技术存在差异,但我们认为“一刀切策略:全身麻醉、不使用补片修补的传统内膜切除术、从不使用分流器且始终进行近红外光谱监测”可安全用于接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者。

相似文献

1
Safe carotid endarterectomy: "one fits all strategy".安全的颈动脉内膜切除术:“一刀切”策略
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2020 Sep;17(3):137-142. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2020.99077. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验