Suppr超能文献

通过常规、超声和微波辅助单萃取方法对沉积物中重金属进行形态分析:与改进的连续萃取程序的比较

Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: a comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure.

作者信息

Arain Muhammad B, Kazi Tasneem G, Jamali Muhammad K, Jalbani Nusrat, Afridi Hassan I, Baig Jameel A

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro 76080, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater. 2008 Jun 15;154(1-3):998-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 9.

Abstract

Sequential extraction procedure proposed by the European Standards, Measurements and Testing (SM&T) Program, formerly the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), has been applied for the heavy metals (HMs) partitioning in fresh water lake sediment samples. The results obtained by conventional sequential extraction BCR method (SEB) for Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn were compared with those estimated from three alternative single extractions, conventional (CSE), ultrasonic (USE) and microwave assisted (MSE), using identical operating conditions applied in each individual BCR fraction and validated by the CRM BCR 701. Extractable HMs contents obtained by all compared methodologies were measured by atomic absorption spectrometery. With the use of compromised sonication and microwave conditions, steps 1-3 of the sequential extraction (excluding the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3) could be completed between 15-30 min using ultrasonic bath, while 60-120 s were required for MSE. The total extractable metal contents obtained by three single extractions ranged from 75.1% to 114.0% except Cr in first step, which was extracted (125.3%) by MSE method as compared to those obtained by SEB procedure. The precision of the proposed BCR single extraction methods (expressed as RSD%) was found in the range of (3.99-9.6%) for all metals.

摘要

欧洲标准、测量与测试(SM&T)计划(前身为欧洲标准计量局(BCR))提出的连续萃取程序已应用于淡水湖沉积物样品中重金属(HMs)的分配研究。将传统连续萃取BCR法(SEB)测定镉、铜、铬、镍、铅和锌的结果,与在每个BCR组分中采用相同操作条件并经CRM BCR 701验证的三种替代单萃取方法(传统萃取(CSE)、超声萃取(USE)和微波辅助萃取(MSE))估算的结果进行比较。所有比较方法获得的可萃取重金属含量均采用原子吸收光谱法测定。通过采用折中的超声和微波条件,连续萃取的步骤1至3(不包括步骤3中的过氧化氢消解)使用超声浴在15至30分钟内即可完成,而MSE法则需要60至120秒。除第一步中的铬外,三种单萃取方法获得的总可萃取金属含量在75.1%至114.0%之间,其中第一步中铬通过MSE法萃取的含量(125.3%)高于SEB法。所有金属的BCR单萃取方法的精密度(以相对标准偏差(RSD%)表示)在3.99%至9.6%范围内。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验