Suppr超能文献

[术后镇痛中硬膜外导管和神经丛导管的细菌污染频率]

[Frequency of bacterial contamination of epidural and plexus catheters in postoperative analgesia].

作者信息

Carazo J, Regata C, Chabás E, Vila J, Tercero J, Sala-Blanch X

机构信息

Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 Nov;54(9):537-42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is little available information regarding contamination of perineural catheters. Incidence ranges from 5% to 57%, depending on the location of the catheter. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and predisposing factors of bacterial contamination of these catheters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 47 patients who had an epidural (24 patients) or perineural (23 patients) catheter inserted for a minimum of 48 hours. We recorded details of the patients' characteristics, difficulty of insertion and duration of placement of the catheter, antibiotic treatment received, and signs of local or systemic infection immediately after surgery. When the catheters were removed, cultures were prepared using the Maki method. A descriptive analysis was performed and the frequency of contamination was determined using various parameters.

RESULTS

The incidence of contamination was 28% (13 patients): 5/24 (21%) in epidural catheters, 6/17 (35%) in femoral catheters, and 2/6 (33%) in brachial and sciatic plexus catheters. Colonization was not influenced by the patients' characteristics, technical difficulties in placing the catheter, prophylactic antibiotic treatment, or the characteristics of the infusion administered. None of the patients presented clinical signs of infection. The most commonly isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis, found in 10 patients (69% of the colonized catheters).

CONCLUSIONS

Although infection of perineural catheters is exceptional when they are placed for 2 or more days, contamination is very common. Epidemiological studies are required to evaluate the variables involved.

摘要

目的

关于神经周围导管污染的可用信息很少。其发生率在5%至57%之间,具体取决于导管的位置。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估这些导管细菌污染的发生率及易感因素。

患者与方法

该研究纳入了47例患者,他们接受了硬膜外导管(24例)或神经周围导管(23例)置入,置管时间至少为48小时。我们记录了患者的特征细节、置管难度、导管放置时间、接受的抗生素治疗以及术后立即出现的局部或全身感染迹象。当拔除导管时,采用马基方法进行培养。进行了描述性分析,并使用各种参数确定污染频率。

结果

污染发生率为28%(13例患者):硬膜外导管污染率为5/24(21%),股导管污染率为6/17(35%),臂丛和坐骨神经丛导管污染率为2/6(33%)。定植不受患者特征、置管技术难度、预防性抗生素治疗或输注特性的影响。所有患者均未出现感染的临床体征。最常分离出的微生物是表皮葡萄球菌,在10例患者(定植导管的69%)中发现。

结论

尽管神经周围导管放置2天或更长时间时感染情况罕见,但污染非常常见。需要进行流行病学研究来评估相关变量。

相似文献

5
Bacterial colonization after tunneling in 402 perineural catheters: a prospective study.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1326-30. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819673aa.
6
[Peridural catheter for postoperative long-term analgesia in children].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Aug;31(6):362-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995936.
9
Epidural catheter colonization is not associated with infection.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002 Winter;3(4):359-65. doi: 10.1089/109629602762539571.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验