Riley Barbara L, Edwards Nancy C, d'Avernas Josie R
Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, Lyle S. Hallman Institute N, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
Health Promot Int. 2008 Mar;23(1):24-34. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam036. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
Resource allocation is a critical issue for public health decision-makers. Yet little is known about the level and type of resources needed to build capacity to plan and implement comprehensive programs. This paper examines the relationships between investments and changes in organizational capacity and program implementation in the first phase (1998-2003) of the Ontario Heart Health Program (OHHP)--a province-wide, comprehensive public health program that involved 40 community partnerships. The study represents a subset of findings from a provincial evaluation. Investments, organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities were measured longitudinally. Investment information was gathered annually from the provincial government, local public health units and community partners using standard reports, and was available from 1998 to 2002. Organizational capacity and program implementation were measured using a written survey, completed by all health units at five measurement times from 1994 to 2002. Combining provincial and local sources, the average total investment by year five was $1.66 per capita. Organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities increased both before and during the first 2 years of the OHHP, and then plateaued at a modest level for capacity and a low level for implementation after that. Amount of funding was positively associated with organizational capacity, yet this association was overpowered by the negative influence of turnover of a key staff position. Regression analysis indicated that staff turnover explained 23% of local variability in organizational capacity. Findings reinforce the need for adequate investment and retention of key staff positions in complex partnership programs. Better accounting of public health investments, including monetary and in-kind investments, is needed to inform decisions about the amount and duration of public health investments that will lead to effective program implementation.
资源分配是公共卫生决策者面临的关键问题。然而,对于建设规划和实施综合项目能力所需资源的水平和类型,我们知之甚少。本文考察了安大略省心脏健康项目(OHHP)第一阶段(1998 - 2003年)投资与组织能力变化以及项目实施之间的关系。OHHP是一项全省范围的综合公共卫生项目,涉及40个社区伙伴关系。该研究代表了省级评估的部分结果。对投资、公共卫生单位的组织能力以及心脏健康活动的实施进行了纵向测量。投资信息通过标准报告每年从省政府、地方公共卫生单位和社区伙伴处收集,时间跨度为1998年至2002年。组织能力和项目实施通过书面调查进行测量,所有卫生单位在1994年至2002年的五个测量时间点完成该调查。综合省级和地方数据来源,到第五年人均平均总投资为1.66美元。在OHHP的前两年及期间,公共卫生单位的组织能力和心脏健康活动的实施均有所增加,之后能力维持在适度水平,实施则维持在低水平。资金数额与组织能力呈正相关,但这种关联被关键员工职位更替的负面影响所抵消。回归分析表明,员工更替解释了组织能力中23%的地方差异。研究结果强化了在复杂伙伴关系项目中进行充足投资和留住关键员工职位的必要性。需要更好地核算公共卫生投资,包括货币和实物投资,以便为有关公共卫生投资的数额和期限的决策提供信息,从而实现有效的项目实施。