Warrant Eric J, Kelber Almut, Wallén Rita, Wcislo William T
Department of Cell & Organism Biology, Zoology Building, University of Lund, Helgonavägen 3, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2006 Dec;35(4):293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2006.08.012.
Nocturnal bees, wasps and ants have considerably larger ocelli than their diurnal relatives, suggesting an active role in vision at night. In a first step to understanding what this role might be, the morphology and physiological optics of ocelli were investigated in three tropical rainforest species - the nocturnal sweat bee Megalopta genalis, the nocturnal paper wasp Apoica pallens and the diurnal paper wasp Polistes occidentalis - using hanging-drop techniques and standard histological methods. Ocellar image quality, in addition to lens focal length and back focal distance, was determined in all three species. During flight, the ocellar receptive fields of both nocturnal species are centred very dorsally, possibly in order to maximise sensitivity to the narrow dorsal field of light that enters through gaps in the rainforest canopy. Since all ocelli investigated had a slightly oval shape, images were found to be astigmatic: images formed by the major axis of the ocellus were located further from the proximal surface of the lens than images formed by the minor axis. Despite being astigmatic, images formed at either focal plane were reasonably sharp in all ocelli investigated. When compared to the position of the retina below the lens, measurements of back focal distance reveal that the ocelli of Megalopta are highly underfocused and unable to resolve spatial detail. This together with their very large and tightly packed rhabdoms suggests a role in making sensitive measurements of ambient light intensity. In contrast, the ocelli of the two wasps form images near the proximal boundary of the retina, suggesting the potential for modest resolving power. In light of these results, possible roles for ocelli in nocturnal bees and wasps are discussed, including the hypothesis that they might be involved in nocturnal homing and navigation, using two main cues: the spatial pattern of bright patches of daylight visible through the rainforest canopy, and compass information obtained from polarised skylight (from the setting sun or the moon) that penetrates these patches.
夜间活动的蜜蜂、黄蜂和蚂蚁的单眼比它们白天活动的同类大得多,这表明单眼在夜间视觉中发挥着积极作用。为了初步了解这个作用可能是什么,研究人员使用悬滴技术和标准组织学方法,对三种热带雨林物种——夜间活动的汗蜂Megalopta genalis、夜间活动的纸黄蜂Apoica pallens和白天活动的纸黄蜂Polistes occidentalis——的单眼形态和生理光学进行了研究。测定了这三个物种的单眼图像质量,以及晶状体焦距和后焦距。在飞行过程中,两个夜间活动物种的单眼感受野都非常集中在背部,这可能是为了最大限度地提高对通过雨林树冠间隙进入的狭窄背部光场的敏感度。由于所有被研究的单眼都呈略微椭圆形,因此发现图像是像散的:由单眼长轴形成的图像比由短轴形成的图像离晶状体近端表面更远。尽管图像是像散的,但在所有被研究的单眼中,在任一焦平面形成的图像都相当清晰。与晶状体下方视网膜的位置相比,后焦距测量结果表明,Megalopta的单眼严重欠焦,无法分辨空间细节。这与它们非常大且紧密排列的视杆一起,表明其在对环境光强度进行灵敏测量中发挥作用。相比之下,两种黄蜂的单眼在视网膜近端边界附近形成图像,这表明它们具有一定的分辨能力。根据这些结果,讨论了单眼在夜间蜜蜂和黄蜂中的可能作用,包括它们可能参与夜间归巢和导航的假设,其利用两个主要线索:通过雨林树冠可见的明亮日光斑块的空间模式,以及从穿透这些斑块的偏振 skylight(来自落日或月亮)获得的罗盘信息。