Sakao Yukinori, Miyamoto Hideaki, Oh Shiaki, Takahashi Nobumasa, Sakuraba Motoki
Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Dec;2(12):1107-11. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815ba24e.
We have already shown that postoperative survival was poor in p-N3 patients from the experience of extended radical nodal dissection (ERD: cervical and bilateral mediastinal nodal dissection) for lung cancer. In this retrospective study, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological factors associated with p-N3 in patients with mediastinal lymph node involvement (excluding c-N3) who underwent ERD, and we studied their impact on prognosis.
Between 1996 and April 2006, in patients with lung cancer in the right upper lobe, we performed ERD after obtaining informed consent from the patients. The study comprised 8 females and 29 males (median age of 60 years), with 15/7/15 cases of c-N0/c-N1/c-N2, respectively. The clinicopathological records of each patient were examined for prognostic factors associated with p-N3, including age, gender, histology, c-N number, preoperative serum CEA level, number of metastatic stations, and distribution of metastatic nodes according to the system of Naruke et al. Because c-N3 cases were excluded from the study, we defined p-N3 as unexpected N3.
Of the 37 study subjects, 19 (51.4%) had one or more metastases to the mediastinal lymph nodes. Of these 19 patients, 10 (52.6%) had metastases to cervical and/or contralateral mediastinal lymph nodes (unexpected N3; 5-year survival was 0%). C-N factor (c-N2), nonskip N2, multistation mediastinal lymph node metastasis, highest mediastinal nodal involvement, and pT status were significantly associated with unexpected N3. In particular, multistation mediastinal lymph node metastasis and highest mediastinal nodal involvement were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analyses.
Because unexpected N3 patients showed a poor prognosis after ERD, treatment modalities other than surgery should be considered. On the other hand, because true N2 patients showed a good outcome after surgery, surgical resection may be considered an important therapeutic modality even for N2 patients, given that they show single-station mediastinal nodal involvement or c-N0-1.
根据肺癌扩大根治性淋巴结清扫术(ERD:颈部及双侧纵隔淋巴结清扫术)的经验,我们已经表明p-N3患者术后生存率较低。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在明确接受ERD的纵隔淋巴结受累(不包括c-N3)患者中与p-N3相关的临床病理因素,并研究它们对预后的影响。
1996年至2006年4月期间,对于右上叶肺癌患者,在获得患者知情同意后进行ERD。该研究包括8名女性和29名男性(中位年龄60岁),分别有15/7/15例c-N0/c-N1/c-N2。检查每位患者的临床病理记录,以寻找与p-N3相关的预后因素,包括年龄、性别、组织学类型、c-N分期、术前血清癌胚抗原水平、转移站数量以及根据Naruke等人的系统划分的转移淋巴结分布情况。由于c-N3病例被排除在研究之外,我们将p-N3定义为意外的N3。
在37名研究对象中,19名(51.4%)有一个或多个纵隔淋巴结转移。在这19名患者中,10名(52.6%)有颈部和/或对侧纵隔淋巴结转移(意外的N3;5年生存率为0%)。c-N因素(c-N2)、非跳跃性N2、多站纵隔淋巴结转移、最高纵隔淋巴结受累以及pT状态与意外的N3显著相关。特别是,多站纵隔淋巴结转移和最高纵隔淋巴结受累在多变量分析中是显著的预后因素。
由于意外的N3患者在ERD后预后较差,应考虑手术以外的治疗方式。另一方面,由于真正的N2患者术后预后良好,鉴于他们表现为单站纵隔淋巴结受累或c-N0-1,手术切除甚至对于N2患者也可能被视为一种重要的治疗方式。