Suppr超能文献

专家证人改革。

Expert witness reform.

作者信息

Horton J Bauer, Reece Edward, Janis Jeffrey E, Broughton George, Hollier Larry, Thornton James F, Kenkel Jeffrey M, Rohrich Rod J

机构信息

Dallas, Texas From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Nancy L & Perry Bass Advanced Wound Healing Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):2095-2100. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000296049.42259.39.

Abstract

The legal system depends on the medical expert for evidence. Doctors readily complain about frivolous cases that go to trial, yet a lawyer cannot bring a frivolous claim to trial without a physician expert witness stating that the claim is not frivolous. An insurance company cannot raise premiums without medical expert witnesses servicing the increasing litigation against the insured. Physicians must look to themselves as a major contributor to rising malpractice insurance costs. For without the physician expert witness, no medical malpractice lawsuit can take place. It is the expert physician, not the attorneys or insurance companies, who defines "meritless" and "frivolous" and who ultimately controls the courts' medical malpractice caseload.

摘要

法律体系依赖医学专家提供证据。医生们常常抱怨那些进入审判程序的无意义案件,然而,如果没有医学专家证人声明该索赔并非无意义,律师就无法将无意义的索赔诉诸审判。如果没有医学专家证人应对针对被保险人不断增加的诉讼,保险公司就无法提高保费。医生们必须将自身视为医疗事故保险成本上升的主要促成因素。因为没有医学专家证人,就不会发生医疗事故诉讼。定义“无价值”和“无意义”并最终控制法院医疗事故案件数量的是专家医生,而非律师或保险公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验