• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患儿中单价乙肝疫苗和甲乙肝联合疫苗加速与快速接种程序的比较。

Comparison of accelerated and rapid schedules for monovalent hepatitis B and combined hepatitis A/B vaccines in children with cancer.

作者信息

Köksal Yavuz, Varan Ali, Aydin G Burca, Sari Neriman, Yazici Nalan, Yalcin Bilgehan, Kutluk Tezer, Akyuz Canan, Büyükpamukçu Münevver

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hacettepe University, Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;24(8):587-94. doi: 10.1080/08880010701703511.

DOI:10.1080/08880010701703511
PMID:18092249
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of immunization against hepatitis A and B infections with "rapid" or "accelerated" schedules in children with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Fifty-one children were recruited to receive either vaccination schedule, in the "rapid vaccination schedule"; hepatitis B (group I) or combined hepatitis A/B vaccines (group III) were administered at months 0, 1, 2, and 12; in the "accelerated vaccination schedule," hepatitis B (group II) or combined hepatitis A/B (group IV) vaccines were administered on days 0, 7, 21, and 365 intramuscularly. The seroconversion rates at months 1 and 3 were 35.7 and 57.1% in group I and 25 and 18.8% in group II, respectively. Group I developed higher seroconversion rates at month 3. In group III the seroconversion rates for hepatitis B at months 1 and 3 were 54.5 and 60% and in group IV 50 and 70%, respectively. For hepatitis A, the seroconversion rates at months 1 and 3 were 81.8 and 90% in group III and 80 and 88.9% in group IV, respectively. The accelerated vaccination schedule seems to have no advantage in children receiving cancer chemotherapy except for high antibody levels at month 1. In conclusion, the accelerated vaccination schedules are not good choices for cancer patients. The combined hepatitis A/B vaccine is more effective than monovalent vaccine in cancer patients, which probably can be explained by an adjuvant effect of the antigens. The seroconversion of hepatitis A by the combined hepatitis A/B vaccination is very good in cancer patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在接受化疗的癌症患儿中采用“快速”或“加速”免疫程序接种甲型和乙型肝炎疫苗的效果。招募了51名儿童接受其中一种免疫程序,在“快速免疫程序”中,乙型肝炎疫苗(第一组)或甲型/乙型联合疫苗(第三组)在第0、1、2和12个月接种;在“加速免疫程序”中,乙型肝炎疫苗(第二组)或甲型/乙型联合疫苗(第四组)在第0、7、21和365天进行肌肉注射。第一组在第1个月和第3个月的血清转化率分别为35.7%和57.1%,第二组分别为25%和18.8%。第一组在第3个月的血清转化率更高。在第三组中,乙型肝炎在第1个月和第3个月的血清转化率分别为54.5%和60%,第四组分别为50%和70%。对于甲型肝炎,第三组在第1个月和第3个月的血清转化率分别为81.8%和90%,第四组分别为80%和88.9%。除了在第1个月抗体水平较高外,加速免疫程序对接受癌症化疗的儿童似乎没有优势。总之,加速免疫程序对癌症患者不是好的选择。甲型/乙型联合疫苗在癌症患者中比单价疫苗更有效,这可能可以用抗原的佐剂作用来解释。在癌症患者中,通过甲型/乙型联合疫苗接种甲型肝炎的血清转化非常好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of accelerated and rapid schedules for monovalent hepatitis B and combined hepatitis A/B vaccines in children with cancer.癌症患儿中单价乙肝疫苗和甲乙肝联合疫苗加速与快速接种程序的比较。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007 Dec;24(8):587-94. doi: 10.1080/08880010701703511.
2
Rapid and sustained immune response against hepatitis A and B achieved with combined vaccine using an accelerated administration schedule.采用加速接种程序的联合疫苗可实现对甲型和乙型肝炎的快速且持续的免疫反应。
J Travel Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00106.x.
3
Immunogenicity of an accelerated vaccination regime with a combined hepatitis a/b vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C.慢性丙型肝炎患者采用甲型/乙型肝炎联合疫苗加速接种方案的免疫原性。
Z Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;41(10):983-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42929.
4
[Comparison of two different vaccination schemes against Hepatitis A and B in Mexican children and adolescents].[墨西哥儿童和青少年中两种不同甲型和乙型肝炎疫苗接种方案的比较]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2003 Oct-Dec;68(4):271-6.
5
Immunogenicity of two paediatric doses of monovalent hepatitis B or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in 8-10-year-old children.两剂儿科单价乙型肝炎疫苗或甲型和乙型肝炎联合疫苗在8至10岁儿童中的免疫原性。
Vaccine. 2005 Jul 1;23(31):4082-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.07.022. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
6
[Safety and immunogenicity of Bilive combined hepatitis A and B vaccine].Bilive 甲型乙型肝炎联合疫苗的安全性和免疫原性
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Jun;25(6):470-3.
7
A two-dose schedule for combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in children aged 6-15 years.6至15岁儿童甲型和乙型肝炎联合疫苗的两剂接种程序。
Vaccine. 2005 Apr 22;23(22):2876-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.059.
8
Long-term persistence of antibodies induced by vaccination and safety follow-up, with the first combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B in children and adults.儿童和成人中首款甲型和乙型肝炎联合疫苗接种诱导抗体的长期持久性及安全性随访
J Med Virol. 2001 Sep;65(1):6-13.
9
Reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile of a two-dose combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in 1-11-year-old children.1至11岁儿童两剂甲型和乙型肝炎联合疫苗的反应原性和免疫原性概况
Vaccine. 2005 Oct 17;23(43):5099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.06.003.
10
Antibody titers and response to vaccination against hepatitis A and B in pediatric patients with portal hypertension.门静脉高压症患儿的甲型和乙型肝炎抗体滴度及疫苗接种反应
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2008 Sep;38(3):187-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatitis B Vaccination in Children With Ongoing Cancer Treatment: A Safety and Efficacy Study of Super-Accelerated Vaccination Scheme.正在接受癌症治疗的儿童的乙肝疫苗接种:超加速接种方案的安全性和有效性研究
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021 Sep;56(5):469-473. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21090.
2
The accelerated hepatitis B virus vaccination schedule among hemodialysis patients, does it work? A randomized controlled trial.加速乙型肝炎病毒疫苗接种方案在血液透析患者中的应用效果如何?一项随机对照试验。
J Nephrol. 2017 Dec;30(6):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0443-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Guidelines on vaccinations in paediatric haematology and oncology patients.
儿童血液学和肿瘤学患者的疫苗接种指南。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:707691. doi: 10.1155/2014/707691. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Immunization of children receiving immunosuppressive therapy for cancer or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.接受癌症免疫抑制治疗或造血干细胞移植的儿童的免疫接种。
Ochsner J. 2012 Fall;12(3):228-43.