Eaton J S, Haas M R, Abraham A S, Reus V I, Goldberg R
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Apr;33(4):439-42. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770040019005.
During the last year, the Psychiatry Education Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health undertook an exhaustive review of 530 training proposals from 205 institutions. The scope of such an endeavor, as well as the desire to maintain peer review, necessitated the recruitment of 90 outside consultants. The need for consistency of judgment among a large group of site visitors gave rise to a document that detailed points of concern in the evaluation of psychiatric training programs. Broader dissemination of this document might be useful in a program's self-evaluation, and might further its understanding of the site-visit process. The result of many such evaluations should be the improvement of psychiatric education throughout the country.
在过去一年里，美国国立精神卫生研究所的精神病学教育部门对来自205个机构的530份培训提案进行了详尽审查。鉴于这项工作的规模以及维持同行评审的需要，招募了90位外部顾问。为确保大批实地考察人员的评判保持一致，制定了一份文件，详细列出了评估精神病学培训项目时需要关注的要点。更广泛地传播这份文件可能有助于项目进行自我评估，并增进其对实地考察过程的了解。诸多此类评估的结果应是推动全国精神病学教育的改进。
