• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团块大小和硬度对咀嚼周期运动学受试者内变异性的影响。

Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics.

作者信息

Wintergerst Ana M, Throckmorton Gaylord S, Buschang Peter H

机构信息

National University of Mexico (UNAM), Graduate School of Dentistry, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Apr;53(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012
PMID:18093571
Abstract

This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2g and 1g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.

摘要

本研究分析了团块硬度和大小如何影响咀嚼周期运动学的个体内变异性。进行了两项独立的前瞻性研究;两者均使用光电记录系统追踪下巴运动。计算机程序识别出每个受试者最具代表性的十个周期,并使用多水平建模程序来估计方差。一项研究评估了38名受试者,他们以随机顺序咀嚼1克、2克、4克或8克口香糖。第二项研究评估了26名受试者,他们以随机顺序咀嚼约2.5克较硬(670克)或较软(440克)的口香糖。就团块大小而言,2克和1克团块分别产生了最小和最大的个体内相对变异性;在周期持续时间和偏移方面发现了最大差异。除了向平衡侧的侧向运动外,咀嚼较硬口香糖时的个体内变异性始终大于咀嚼较软口香糖时的个体内变异性。由于团块硬度和团块大小对个体内变异性的影响不同,因此在设计研究咀嚼运动学的实验时必须予以考虑。我们得出结论,在咀嚼周期运动学研究中应使用2克软口香糖团块,以减少个体内变异性并提高统计效力。

相似文献

1
Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics.团块大小和硬度对咀嚼周期运动学受试者内变异性的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Apr;53(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
2
Bolus size and unilateral chewing cycle kinematics.团块大小与单侧咀嚼周期运动学
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Jul;49(7):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.01.014.
3
Reducing within-subject variation in chewing cycle kinematics--a statistical approach.减少咀嚼周期运动学中受试者内的变异性——一种统计学方法。
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Dec;49(12):991-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.07.010.
4
Effect of an auditory cue on chewing cycle kinematics.听觉提示对咀嚼周期运动学的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Jan;51(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
5
Chewing cycle kinematics of subjects with deepbite malocclusion.深覆合错颌畸形患者的咀嚼周期运动学
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 May;131(5):627-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.037.
6
The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics.团块硬度对咀嚼运动学的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jul;29(7):689-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00862.x.
7
Association between masticatory performance using a colour-changeable chewing gum and jaw movement.使用变色口香糖的咀嚼性能与下颌运动之间的关系。
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Aug;38(8):555-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02204.x. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
8
Distance of the contact glide in the closing masticatory stroke during mastication of three types of food.三种食物咀嚼时闭口咀嚼滑行距离。
J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Aug;36(8):571-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01956.x. Epub 2009 May 18.
9
Effect of bolus hardness on the chewing pattern and activation of masticatory muscles in subjects with normal dental occlusion.团块硬度对正常牙合受试者咀嚼模式及咀嚼肌激活的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):931-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
10
Analysis of masseter muscle oxygenation and mandibular movement during experimental gum chewing with different hardness.不同硬度口香糖咀嚼实验中咬肌氧合作用与下颌运动分析
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(2):113-21. doi: 10.1080/00016350802715806.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related changes in neuromotor function when performing a concurrent motor task.执行并发运动任务时神经运动功能的年龄相关变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Mar;238(3):565-574. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05736-8. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Effect of attention on chewing and swallowing behaviors in healthy humans.注意对健康人体咀嚼和吞咽行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 12;9(1):6013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42422-4.
3
Model identification of stomatognathic muscle system activity during mastication.咀嚼过程中口颌肌肉系统活动的模型识别
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jan;13(1):135-145. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3921. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Frequency of stage II oral transport cycles in healthy human.健康人体中II期口腔运输周期的频率。
Dysphagia. 2014 Dec;29(6):685-91. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9562-5. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Masticatory performance and chewing cycle kinematics-are they related?咀嚼性能和咀嚼周期运动学——它们之间有关联吗?
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):295-301. doi: 10.2319/061109-333.1.