• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向内科医生的基于网络的临床诊断支持系统的性能

Performance of a web-based clinical diagnosis support system for internists.

作者信息

Graber Mark L, Mathew Ashlei

机构信息

Medical Service-111, VA Medical Center, Northport, NY 11768, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0271-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0271-8
PMID:18095042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2150633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support systems can improve medical diagnosis and reduce diagnostic errors. Older systems, however, were cumbersome to use and had limited success in identifying the correct diagnosis in complicated cases.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the sensitivity and speed of "Isabel" (Isabel Healthcare Inc., USA), a new web-based clinical decision support system designed to suggest the correct diagnosis in complex medical cases involving adults.

METHODS

We tested 50 consecutive Internal Medicine case records published in the New England Journal of Medicine. We first either manually entered 3 to 6 key clinical findings from the case (recommended approach) or pasted in the entire case history. The investigator entering key words was aware of the correct diagnosis. We then determined how often the correct diagnosis was suggested in the list of 30 differential diagnoses generated by the clinical decision support system. We also evaluated the speed of data entry and results recovery.

RESULTS

The clinical decision support system suggested the correct diagnosis in 48 of 50 cases (96%) with key findings entry, and in 37 of the 50 cases (74%) if the entire case history was pasted in. Pasting took seconds, manual entry less than a minute, and results were provided within 2-3 seconds with either approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The Isabel clinical decision support system quickly suggested the correct diagnosis in almost all of these complex cases, particularly with key finding entry. The system performed well in this experimental setting and merits evaluation in more natural settings and clinical practice.

摘要

背景

临床决策支持系统可改善医学诊断并减少诊断错误。然而,早期系统使用不便,在复杂病例中确定正确诊断的成功率有限。

目的

评估“伊莎贝尔”(美国伊莎贝尔医疗保健公司)的敏感性和速度,这是一种新型基于网络的临床决策支持系统,旨在为涉及成人的复杂医疗病例提供正确诊断建议。

方法

我们测试了连续发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》上的50份内科病例记录。我们首先手动输入病例中的3至6项关键临床发现(推荐方法),或粘贴整个病例史。输入关键词的研究人员知道正确诊断。然后,我们确定临床决策支持系统生成的30种鉴别诊断列表中正确诊断被建议的频率。我们还评估了数据输入和结果恢复的速度。

结果

通过输入关键发现,临床决策支持系统在50例病例中的48例(96%)中建议了正确诊断;如果粘贴整个病例史,则在50例病例中的37例(74%)中建议了正确诊断。粘贴只需几秒钟,手动输入不到一分钟,两种方法均可在2至3秒内提供结果。

结论

伊莎贝尔临床决策支持系统在几乎所有这些复杂病例中都能快速给出正确诊断建议,尤其是通过输入关键发现时。该系统在本实验环境中表现良好,值得在更自然的环境和临床实践中进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/2349104/26ad063358fc/11606_2007_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/2349104/0325cb6f9979/11606_2007_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/2349104/26ad063358fc/11606_2007_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/2349104/0325cb6f9979/11606_2007_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cf/2349104/26ad063358fc/11606_2007_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of a web-based clinical diagnosis support system for internists.面向内科医生的基于网络的临床诊断支持系统的性能
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0271-8.
2
Validation of a diagnostic reminder system in emergency medicine: a multi-centre study.急诊医学诊断提醒系统的验证:一项多中心研究。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Sep;24(9):619-24. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.044107.
3
Diagnostic omission errors in acute paediatric practice: impact of a reminder system on decision-making.儿科急症诊疗中的诊断遗漏错误:提醒系统对决策的影响
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Nov 6;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-37.
4
ISABEL: a web-based differential diagnostic aid for paediatrics: results from an initial performance evaluation.伊莎贝尔:一种基于网络的儿科鉴别诊断辅助工具:初步性能评估结果
Arch Dis Child. 2003 May;88(5):408-13. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.5.408.
5
Computerized diagnostic decision support systems - a comparative performance study of Isabel Pro vs. ChatGPT4.计算机化诊断决策支持系统——Isabel Pro 与 ChatGPT4 的性能比较研究。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 May 7;11(3):250-258. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0033. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
6
Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.衡量诊断决策支持对临床决策质量的影响:开发可靠且有效的综合评分
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):563-72. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1338. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
7
Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.评估提醒系统对减少诊断错误的潜在影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 28;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-22.
8
Is language an issue? Accuracy of the German computerized diagnostic decision support system ISABEL and cross-validation with the English counterpart.语言是否存在问题?德国计算机化诊断决策支持系统 ISABEL 的准确性以及与英语对应系统的交叉验证。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jul 24;10(4):398-405. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0047. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
9
Should electronic differential diagnosis support be used early or late in the diagnostic process? A multicentre experimental study of Isabel.电子鉴别诊断支持应该在诊断过程的早期还是晚期使用?Isabel 的一项多中心实验研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):426-433. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013493. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Evaluation of an Internet delivered pediatric diagnosis support system (ISABEL) in a tertiary care center in India.印度一家三级医疗中心对基于互联网的儿科诊断支持系统(ISABEL)的评估。
Indian Pediatr. 2005 Nov;42(11):1086-91.

引用本文的文献

1
[Retrospective analysis of a patient cohort with suspicion of systemic amyloidosis, finally not confirmed].[对疑似系统性淀粉样变性患者队列的回顾性分析,最终未得到证实]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2025 Sep;150(18):e42-e49. doi: 10.1055/a-2601-8080. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
Appropriate semantic qualifiers increase diagnostic accuracy when using a clinical decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.使用临床决策支持系统时,恰当的语义限定词可提高诊断准确性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 15;25(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07294-5.
3
Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Performance: Differential Diagnosis Lists by LLaMA3 Versus LLaMA2 for Case Reports.

本文引用的文献

1
Googling for a diagnosis--use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study.通过谷歌搜索进行诊断——将谷歌用作诊断辅助工具:基于互联网的研究
BMJ. 2006 Dec 2;333(7579):1143-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39003.640567.AE. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
2
Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.评估提醒系统对减少诊断错误的潜在影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 28;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-22.
3
Diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科诊断错误。
对比分析诊断性能:基于案例报告的 LLaMA3 与 LLaMA2 的鉴别诊断列表。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 19;8:e64844. doi: 10.2196/64844.
4
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis Lists Generated by Gemini Advanced, Gemini, and Bard for a Case Report Series Analysis: Cross-Sectional Study.评估Gemini Advanced、Gemini和Bard生成的鉴别诊断列表准确性的比较研究:用于病例报告系列分析的横断面研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 2;12:e63010. doi: 10.2196/63010.
5
Diagnostic performance of generative artificial intelligences for a series of complex case reports.生成式人工智能对一系列复杂病例报告的诊断性能
Digit Health. 2024 Jul 21;10:20552076241265215. doi: 10.1177/20552076241265215. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Evaluating ChatGPT-4's Accuracy in Identifying Final Diagnoses Within Differential Diagnoses Compared With Those of Physicians: Experimental Study for Diagnostic Cases.评估ChatGPT-4在鉴别诊断中识别最终诊断的准确性与医生的准确性比较:诊断病例的实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 26;8:e59267. doi: 10.2196/59267.
7
Evaluating ChatGPT-4's Diagnostic Accuracy: Impact of Visual Data Integration.评估ChatGPT-4的诊断准确性:视觉数据整合的影响。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 9;12:e55627. doi: 10.2196/55627.
8
Clinical Decision Support Requirements for Ventricular Tachycardia Diagnosis Within the Frameworks of Knowledge and Practice: Survey Study.临床决策支持在知识和实践框架下诊断室性心动过速的需求:调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Mar 26;11:e55802. doi: 10.2196/55802.
9
Rare diseases: why is a rapid referral to an expert center so important?罕见病:为什么快速转诊至专家中心如此重要?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09886-7.
10
Can clinical decision support systems be an asset in medical education? An experimental approach.临床决策支持系统能否成为医学教育的有益补充?一种实验方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 11;23(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04568-8.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1493-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1493.
4
Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect.医学诊断错误:一个被忽视的案例。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Feb;31(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31015-4.
5
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
6
How well does decision support software perform in the emergency department?决策支持软件在急诊科的表现如何?
Emerg Med J. 2003 Sep;20(5):426-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.5.426.
7
ISABEL: a web-based differential diagnostic aid for paediatrics: results from an initial performance evaluation.伊莎贝尔:一种基于网络的儿科鉴别诊断辅助工具:初步性能评估结果
Arch Dis Child. 2003 May;88(5):408-13. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.5.408.
8
Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what's the goal?
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):981-92. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210000-00009.
9
Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems.基于计算机的会诊对临床医生诊断推理能力的提升:两个系统的多中心研究
JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1851-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.19.1851.
10
A report card on computer-assisted diagnosis--the grade: C.计算机辅助诊断的成绩单——成绩:C。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1824-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302512.