May Anne M, Duivenvoorden Hugo J, Korstjens Irene, van Weert Ellen, Hoekstra-Weebers Josette E H M, van den Borne Bart, Mesters Ilse, van der Schans Cees P, Ros Wynand J G
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Psychooncology. 2008 Sep;17(9):917-25. doi: 10.1002/pon.1308.
Group-based physical training interventions have been shown to be effective in increasing quality of life in cancer survivors. Until now, however, the impact of cohesion within the group on intervention outcome has not been investigated.
We examined self-reported individual group cohesion ratings collected in the first half of a 12-week rehabilitation programme for cancer survivors (N=132). Four dimensions of group cohesion were measured, i.e. the bond with the group as whole, the bond with other members, cooperation within the group and the instrumental value. Quality of life, physical functioning and fatigue were assessed before and after the intervention using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. Linear multiple multivariate regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between group cohesion and intervention outcome.
The relationship between group cohesion and outcome was significantly modified by gender. Higher ratings of cooperation within the group predicted better post-intervention quality of life and physical functioning and less fatigue in men, and better quality of life and physical functioning in women. Additionally, women who reported a stronger bond with other members showed a lower quality of life after the intervention. No relationship was found between the instrumental value and the outcome variables.
Some dimensions of group cohesion seem to be associated with intervention outcome. The underlying mechanisms need to be unravelled.
基于小组的体育锻炼干预已被证明能有效提高癌症幸存者的生活质量。然而,迄今为止,小组内凝聚力对干预结果的影响尚未得到研究。
我们检查了在一项针对癌症幸存者的为期12周的康复计划上半段收集的自我报告的个人小组凝聚力评分(N = 132)。测量了小组凝聚力的四个维度,即与整个小组的联系、与其他成员的联系、小组内的合作以及工具价值。在干预前后使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30评估生活质量、身体功能和疲劳程度。进行线性多元回归分析以探讨小组凝聚力与干预结果之间的关系。
小组凝聚力与结果之间的关系因性别而有显著差异。小组内合作评分较高预示着男性干预后的生活质量和身体功能更好,疲劳更少,而女性的生活质量和身体功能更好。此外,报告与其他成员联系更强的女性在干预后生活质量较低。未发现工具价值与结果变量之间存在关系。
小组凝聚力的某些维度似乎与干预结果相关。其潜在机制有待阐明。