Lee I-Lin, Wu Cheng-Shyong, Tung Shui-Yi, Lin Paul Y, Shen Chien-Hung, Wei Kuo-Ling, Chang Te-Sheng
Department of Gastroenterology and Department of Pathology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;42(1):42-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225696.54498.ff.
To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancers (EGCs) at a new endoscopic center.
ESD is a novel technique that can facilitate en-bloc resection of EGCs, but seldom reported outside Japan.
A total of 25 consecutive patients (25 lesions) underwent ESD from June 2004 to March 2006. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A underwent ESD from June 2004 to May 2005 (introduction stage) and group B from June 2005 to March 2006. The following data were obtained: tumor size, tumor location, operative time, and major complication.
The complete resection was achieved in 20 lesions (success rate 80%). Four out of 10 lesions from group A were removed by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) piecemeally after ESD failure. Conversely, 14 patients from group B (n=15) were resected by ESD en-bloc (success rate 93.3%). One patient with microscopic residual tumor after ESD was further treated by surgical resection. The time required for resection was significantly longer in group A when compared with group B (130.5 min vs. 81.5 min, P<0.05). Postoperative complication rate between the 2 groups were similar. One patient with piecemeal EMR recurred in follow-up, and was further treated successfully by EMR.
ESD is an ideal method for EGC treatment, but it may result in a risk of complication. The complete resection rate can be improved by endoscopist's experience. Sophisticated endoscopic hemostasis and clipping skills are essential prior ESD procedures. Conventional EMR techniques are also obligatory during the beginning period.
在一家新的内镜中心评估内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌(EGC)的疗效。
ESD是一种能够促进早期胃癌整块切除的新技术,但在日本以外地区鲜有报道。
2004年6月至2006年3月期间,共有25例连续患者(25个病灶)接受了ESD治疗。患者分为两组:A组于2004年6月至2005年5月接受ESD治疗(引入阶段),B组于2005年6月至2006年3月接受治疗。收集了以下数据:肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、手术时间和主要并发症。
20个病灶实现了完整切除(成功率80%)。A组10个病灶中有4个在ESD失败后通过传统内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)分块切除。相反,B组14例患者(共15个病灶)通过ESD整块切除(成功率93.3%)。1例ESD术后有微小残留肿瘤的患者进一步接受了手术切除。与B组相比,A组的切除时间明显更长(130.5分钟对81.5分钟;P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率相似。1例接受分块EMR治疗的患者在随访中复发,再次通过EMR成功治疗。
ESD是治疗早期胃癌的理想方法,但可能存在并发症风险。内镜医师的经验可提高完整切除率。在ESD手术前,熟练的内镜止血和夹闭技术至关重要。在初始阶段,传统的EMR技术也是必不可少的。