Koole P, de Jongh H J, Boering G
Department of Anatomy and Embryology at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cranio. 1991 Jul;9(3):228-40. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1991.11678371.
Electromyographic activity was synchronously recorded by surface and intramuscular electrodes in the same muscle. The activity of the left masseter, left temporalis, and both bellies of the anterior digastric muscle was studied by this double registration technique. In rest position no electromyographic activity could be detected in any of the muscles by both techniques. Both techniques give comparable results in cyclic jaw movements. In isometric contractions, however, differences in the registered activity were observed between the surface electrode on the depressor group muscles and the intramuscularly recorded anterior digastric muscles. Silent periods evoked in the elevator muscles were of slightly longer duration when recorded by intramuscular electrodes than when recorded by surface electrodes. A protruded position of the mandible results in a silent period of longer duration than the position of the mandible in maximal occlusion during clenching for both techniques.
通过表面电极和肌内电极同步记录同一肌肉的肌电图活动。采用这种双重记录技术研究了左侧咬肌、左侧颞肌以及二腹肌前腹两侧的活动。在静息状态下,两种技术均未在任何肌肉中检测到肌电图活动。在周期性下颌运动中,两种技术得出的结果具有可比性。然而,在等长收缩时,在降肌组肌肉上的表面电极与肌内记录的二腹肌前腹之间观察到记录活动的差异。当通过肌内电极记录时,升肌中诱发的静息期持续时间比通过表面电极记录时略长。对于两种技术,下颌前突位置导致的静息期持续时间比紧咬时下颌最大咬合位置的静息期更长。