Suppr超能文献

按照说明使用普拉克斯预刷牙口腔冲洗液并在监督下刷牙的评估。

An assessment of Plax pre-brushing dental rinse used according to directions with supervised toothbrushing.

作者信息

Emling R C, Yankell S L

机构信息

School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1991;2(4):103-6.

PMID:1812901
Abstract

This study assessed the use of a pre-brushing rinse followed with toothbrushing with toothpaste in compliance with label directions. The treatment pre-brushing rinse was compared to a placebo pre-brushing rinse in a cross-over design. The study was started with 20 subjects. One subject developed a throat infection after the first session and was administered an antibiotic prescription and the data was not included in the analyses. No side effects or reactions to the solutions were observed or reported during or following the study. At baseline, the two groups were found to have similar plaque area scores on buccal, lingual, and total tooth surfaces. After rinsing with the pre-brushing solution (Plax) and brushing with an American Dental Association-approved toothbrush and a commercially-available fluoride toothpaste, there was significantly less plaque area when compared to the same regimen with the placebo pre-brushing rinse. For both buccal and lingual plaque area scores the differences were statistically significant at the p less than .05 level favoring Plax. On all surfaces the subjects removed significant amounts of plaque area following rinsing and brushing with toothpaste compared to their baseline scores.

摘要

本研究评估了按照标签说明,在刷牙前先使用含漱液然后再用牙膏刷牙的情况。在交叉设计中,将治疗用刷牙前含漱液与安慰剂刷牙前含漱液进行了比较。该研究最初有20名受试者。一名受试者在第一阶段后出现了咽喉感染,并接受了抗生素处方治疗,其数据未纳入分析。在研究期间或之后,未观察到或报告对溶液的任何副作用或反应。在基线时,发现两组在颊侧、舌侧和全牙面的菌斑面积评分相似。在用刷牙前溶液(Plax)漱口并使用美国牙科协会认可的牙刷和市售含氟牙膏刷牙后,与使用安慰剂刷牙前含漱液的相同方案相比,菌斑面积显著减少。对于颊侧和舌侧菌斑面积评分,差异在p小于0.05水平时具有统计学意义,有利于Plax。与基线评分相比,在所有牙面上,受试者在使用含漱液漱口和用牙膏刷牙后都去除了大量的菌斑面积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验