Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄手术的耐久性。

Durability of surgery for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

de Borst Gert J, Zanen Pieter, de Vries Jean-Paul P, van de Pavoordt Erik D, Ackerstaff Rob G, Moll Frans L

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of carotid surgery for the management of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is challenged by carotid artery stenting (CAS). We reviewed redo CEA in a consecutive series of patients to determine the safety, durability, and long-term benefit associated with repeat surgical treatment for restenosis.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 73 redo procedures in 72 patients (57% men) with a mean age 66 years (range, 49-81 years) was analyzed. The mean interval between prior CEA and redo CEA was 53 months (range, 8-192 months). Operative indications included symptomatic restenosis in 28 patients (38%). A patch angioplasty was performed in 62 patients (85%). The main outcome measures included perioperative and late stroke and death, and the development of secondary restenosis.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. During a mean follow-up of 52 months (range, 12-144 months), the Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival was 85% at 5 years. At 5 years, the cumulative rate of freedom from all strokes was 98%, and the freedom from ipsilateral stroke was 100%. After secondary procedures, re-recurrent stenosis > or =50% occurred in 10 patients (13.7%). The cumulative freedom from re-restenosis (> or =50%) was 85% at 5 years. Five patients (7%) received tertiary carotid reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

Repeat CEA for recurrent stenosis can be performed safely with excellent long-term protection from stroke. These data provide a standard against which the results of CAS can be compared.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)对颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后再狭窄治疗中颈动脉手术的作用提出了挑战。我们回顾了一系列连续患者的再次CEA手术,以确定与再次手术治疗再狭窄相关的安全性、耐久性和长期益处。

方法

分析了72例患者(57%为男性)连续进行的73次再次手术,平均年龄66岁(范围49 - 81岁)。上次CEA与再次CEA之间的平均间隔为53个月(范围8 - 192个月)。手术指征包括28例(38%)有症状的再狭窄。62例患者(85%)进行了补片血管成形术。主要观察指标包括围手术期和晚期中风及死亡情况,以及继发性再狭窄的发生情况。

结果

围手术期无死亡或中风发生。在平均52个月(范围12 - 144个月)的随访中,5年时的Kaplan - Meier累积生存率为85%。5年时,无所有中风的累积发生率为98%,同侧无中风发生率为100%。二次手术后,10例患者(13.7%)出现再发狭窄≥50%。5年时无再狭窄(≥50%)的累积发生率为85%。5例患者(7%)接受了三次颈动脉重建术。

结论

对复发性狭窄进行再次CEA手术可安全进行,并能长期有效预防中风。这些数据提供了一个可与CAS结果进行比较的标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验