Vieira Maria de Fátima Alves, Araújo Cora Luiza Pavin, Neutzling Marilda Borges, Hallal Pedro Curi, Menezes Ana Maria Baptista
Faculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS 96030, Brazil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Dec;23(12):2993-9. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001200020.
Various cut-off points for body mass index have been proposed to assess nutritional status in adolescents. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for evaluating overweight and obesity. In 2004-5, 4,452 adolescents from the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study were evaluated, representing 87.5% of the original cohort. Overweight and obesity were evaluated using the methods proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Obesity Task Force (IOTF). Prevalence of overweight was similar when comparing the two methods (WHO: 23.2%; IOTF: 21.6%). Prevalence of obesity was higher according to the WHO criterion (total sample: 11.6%; boys: 15.1%; girls: 8.2%) as compared to IOTF (total sample: 5.0%; boys: 5.6%; girls: 4.4%). The kappa statistic was around 0.9 for determining overweight and 0.4 for obesity. The IOTF classification showed high specificity in comparison to the WHO criterion for determining overweight and obesity. However, sensitivity was high for overweight but low for obesity. Our data show that the IOTF classification underestimates the prevalence of obesity in early adolescence.
为评估青少年的营养状况,人们提出了不同的体重指数切点。本研究旨在比较两种评估超重和肥胖的方法。在2004年至2005年期间,对来自1993年佩洛塔斯(巴西)出生队列研究的4452名青少年进行了评估,占原始队列的87.5%。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际肥胖特别工作组(IOTF)提出的方法评估超重和肥胖情况。比较两种方法时,超重的患病率相似(WHO:23.2%;IOTF:21.6%)。与IOTF相比,根据WHO标准,肥胖的患病率更高(总样本:11.6%;男孩:15.1%;女孩:8.2%)(IOTF:总样本:5.0%;男孩:5.6%;女孩:4.4%)。确定超重时kappa统计量约为0.9,确定肥胖时为0.4。与WHO确定超重和肥胖的标准相比,IOTF分类显示出较高的特异性。然而,超重的敏感性较高,而肥胖的敏感性较低。我们的数据表明,IOTF分类低估了青春期早期肥胖的患病率。