Berger William, Portella Carla Marques, Fontenelle Leonardo F, Kinrys Gustavo, Mendlowicz Mauro Vitor
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;29 Suppl 2:S61-5. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462007000600005.
In this narrative review, we aimed to describe different pharmacological strategies for the treatment of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder who display different levels of intolerance, resistance, refractoriness, or who are unable to take to antidepressants, especially serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
We searched the ISI web of science and the PubMed for original studies focusing in the treatment of PTSD in different clinical scenarios.
Preliminary evidence pointed towards the efficacy of drugs such as risperidone, olanzapine, lamotrigine and prazosin as strategies to be employed in the above mentioned clinical scenarios. The choice of a specific "second line" drug should take into account not only symptoms, but also pattern of comorbidities, previous response to other treatments, pharmacological interactions, side-effects, and patient's physical conditions.
Future randomized controlled trials should be performed in order to unveil which drugs should be prescribed in the absence of adequate treatment and response to serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
在本叙述性综述中,我们旨在描述针对创伤后应激障碍患者的不同药物治疗策略,这些患者表现出不同程度的不耐受、抵抗、难治性,或无法服用抗抑郁药,尤其是5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。
我们在科学网ISI和PubMed中检索了专注于不同临床场景下创伤后应激障碍治疗的原始研究。
初步证据表明,诸如利培酮、奥氮平、拉莫三嗪和哌唑嗪等药物在上述临床场景中作为治疗策略具有疗效。选择特定的“二线”药物不仅应考虑症状,还应考虑共病模式、既往对其他治疗的反应、药物相互作用、副作用以及患者的身体状况。
未来应开展随机对照试验,以揭示在缺乏充分治疗以及对5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的情况下应开具哪些药物。