Magaña Armando Alcázar, Wrobel Katarzyna, Caudillo Yolanda Alvarado, Zaina Silvio, Lund Gertrud, Wrobel Kazimierz
Instituto de Investigaciones Cientificas, Universidad de Guanajuato, 36000 Guanajuato, Mexico.
Anal Biochem. 2008 Mar 15;374(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.11.026. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
This work has undertaken liquid chromatographic separation of nucleosides and deoxynucleosides. Two different columns with three mobile phases (A, deionized water; B, 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 4.0); C, methanol) and slightly different gradient programs were used. The elution order was as follows: cytidine (C), 2'-deoxycytidine (dC), uridine (U), 5-methyl-2'-cytidine (5mC), 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine (5mdC), guanosine (G), deoxyguanosine (dG), 2'-deoxythymidine (dT), adenosine (A), and 2'-deoxyadenine (dA). Using a Luna C18 Phenomenex column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 microm), the separation was performed at 40 degrees C with a total flow rate of 1 ml/min and a run time of 10 min. The second column was an Agilent C18 (50 x 3 mm, 1.8 microm), for which the run time was 4.5 min with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min (25 degrees C). In application to the DNA digests from human THP-1 cells, the quantification of C, dC, U, 5mC, 5mdC, G, dG, and A was performed. The percentages of global methylation were evaluated based on the 5mdC and dC concentrations (c(5mdC) / [c(5mdC)+c(dC)], where c is concentration in microg/ml) and compared with those calculated from the respective peak areas (A(5mdC) / [A(5mdC)+A(dC)], where A is peak area at 254 nm). For peak area measurements, excellent agreement was obtained with the results reported previously in the same cell line. In the quantitative approach, the results of DNA methylation were higher but consistent with the previous data obtained using mass spectrometric detection. Comparing the analytical features of the two procedures, the use of a smaller column could be recommended because it provides efficient separation (capacity factors in the range of 1.29-10.66), a short run time, and feasibility of nucleoside and deoxynucleoside quantification in real-world samples and because it also minimizes the use of reagents.
这项工作进行了核苷和脱氧核苷的液相色谱分离。使用了两根不同的色谱柱,三种流动相(A,去离子水;B,50 mM磷酸盐缓冲液(pH 4.0);C,甲醇)以及稍有不同的梯度程序。洗脱顺序如下:胞苷(C)、2'-脱氧胞苷(dC)、尿苷(U)、5-甲基-2'-胞苷(5mC)、5-甲基-2'-脱氧胞苷(5mdC)、鸟苷(G)、脱氧鸟苷(dG)、2'-脱氧胸苷(dT)、腺苷(A)和2'-脱氧腺苷(dA)。使用Luna C18 Phenomenex色谱柱(150×4.6 mm,5μm),在40℃下进行分离,总流速为1 ml/min,运行时间为10分钟。第二根色谱柱是安捷伦C18(50×3 mm,1.8μm),其运行时间为4.5分钟,流速为0.6 ml/min(25℃)。在应用于人类THP-1细胞的DNA消化产物时,对C、dC、U、5mC、5mdC、G、dG和A进行了定量。基于5mdC和dC的浓度(c(5mdC) / [c(5mdC)+c(dC)],其中c是以μg/ml为单位的浓度)评估整体甲基化的百分比,并与根据各自峰面积(A(5mdC) / [A(5mdC)+A(dC)],其中A是254 nm处的峰面积)计算得出的百分比进行比较。对于峰面积测量,与先前在同一细胞系中报道的结果取得了极好的一致性。在定量方法中,DNA甲基化的结果较高,但与先前使用质谱检测获得的数据一致。比较这两种方法的分析特性,推荐使用较小的色谱柱,因为它能提供高效分离(容量因子在1.29 - 10.66范围内)、较短的运行时间以及在实际样品中对核苷和脱氧核苷进行定量的可行性,并且还能最大限度地减少试剂的使用。