Moss Howard B, Chen Chiung M, Yi Hsiao-ye
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9304, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Feb;32(2):306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00582.x. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
In DSM-IV, the diagnostic threshold for alcohol dependence (AD) is met when a patient presents with at least 3 of 7 criteria. We have computed the predictive value for each individual DSM-IV AD criterion, and examined subtypes of AD criteria endorsement patterns and their associated severity indicators for community-dwelling AD individuals.
We utilized data from the 2001 to 2002 National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Positive predictive values (PPV) for DSM-IV AD were computed for each of the individual criteria. Patterns of criteria endorsements were identified by latent class analysis (LCA). Sociodemographic status, age of onset and duration of AD, patterns of drinking, and drinking treatment history, were conditional on DSM criteria endorsement clusters, as indicators of the respondents' clinical severity.
At the individual criterion level, the single criterion with the greatest PPV was D7--"Activities given up" with approximately 95% of drinking individuals who endorsed this DSM criterion correctly diagnosed as having DSM-IV AD. In addition to D7, only D5--"Physical/Psychological problems", and D6--"Time spent" had a PPV for AD substantially >50%. The LCA of AD endorsement patterns yielded a 6-cluster solution. The most common response pattern (34.5% of those with AD) was endorsement of 5 criteria: D1--"Quit/Control," D2--"Larger/Longer," D3--"Tolerance," D4--"Withdrawal," and D5--"Physical/Psychological problems." The most severe cluster (14%) was comprised of those who were likely to endorse 7/7 criteria. Cluster 1 (8.3%) did not include an endorsement of withdrawal, despite a heavy pattern of alcohol consumption. Unmarried status was associated with more severe criteria endorsement patterns.
The present findings indicate a Guttman-like scaling of endorsement which yielded associations with severity for some of the concurrent indicators included in the analysis. However, severity measures did not always increase with DSM-IV AD criterion endorsement counts. Although endorsement of 6/7 or 7/7 criteria was associated with greater severity across a variety of indicators, fewer criteria were randomly associated with these measures. These data do not support the use of AD symptom counts as a phenotypic dependent variable. At least 2 extant diagnostic criteria showed relatively low PPV for AD, indicating a need for further assessment of these criteria with new symptoms or re-wording of the current symptom items.
在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中,当患者出现7项标准中的至少3项时,即符合酒精依赖(AD)的诊断阈值。我们计算了DSM-IV中每项AD标准的预测价值,并研究了社区居住的AD患者中AD标准认可模式的亚型及其相关的严重程度指标。
我们使用了2001年至2002年全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)的数据。计算了DSM-IV中AD各项标准的阳性预测值(PPV)。通过潜在类别分析(LCA)确定标准认可模式。社会人口统计学状况、AD的发病年龄和持续时间、饮酒模式以及饮酒治疗史,以DSM标准认可类别为条件,作为受访者临床严重程度的指标。
在个体标准层面,PPV最高的单一标准是D7——“放弃的活动”,约95%认可该DSM标准的饮酒个体被正确诊断为患有DSM-IV AD。除D7外,只有D5——“身体/心理问题”和D6——“花费的时间”对AD的PPV显著>50%。AD认可模式的LCA得出了一个6类解决方案。最常见的反应模式(AD患者中的34.5%)是认可5项标准:D1——“戒酒/控制”、D2——“饮酒量增加/时间延长”、D3——“耐受性”、D4——“戒断反应”和D5——“身体/心理问题”。最严重的类别(14%)由那些可能认可7/7项标准的人组成。第1类(8.3%)尽管饮酒量大,但不包括对戒断反应的认可。未婚状态与更严重的标准认可模式相关。
目前的研究结果表明,认可模式呈现出类似古特曼量表的特征,这与分析中包括的一些并发指标的严重程度相关。然而,严重程度测量并不总是随着DSM-IV AD标准认可数量的增加而增加。虽然认可6/7或7/7项标准与各种指标的更高严重程度相关,但较少的标准与这些测量随机相关。这些数据不支持将AD症状计数用作表型因变量。至少有2项现有诊断标准对AD的PPV相对较低,这表明需要用新症状或重新措辞当前症状项目对这些标准进行进一步评估。