Kane Rosalie A, Chan Jane, Kane Robert L
Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, D527 Mayo Building, 420 Delaware SE, MMC 197, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Gerontologist. 2007;47 Spec No 3:125-40. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.supplement_1.125.
This article assesses the state of research on assisted living (AL) from 1989 to May 2004.
We undertook keyword searches for AL research and amplified these with searches of Web sites, conference proceedings, and follow-up inquiries. We annotated and coded the resultant items according to categories reflecting the research methods used and the topics studied. We did additional comparisons for 38 studies with quantitative data that permitted summarizing resident characteristics, settings, and entry and move-out patterns.
The 411 identified items ranged across a large number of topics. Qualitative studies outnumbered quantitative ones, and longitudinal studies were rare. We found little standardization in the way variables were measured, making cross-study comparisons difficult. As AL research has become more common, some items are directed at studying ways to proceed within AL as opposed to globally commenting on the worth of AL as a service sector.
The research base for AL has grown rapidly but is still underdeveloped. We recommend using more consistent sets of standardized measures in AL studies and reporting analyses based on them. We also recommend fuller reporting of details on sampling, time frames, and measures in AL research.
本文评估了1989年至2004年5月间辅助生活(AL)的研究状况。
我们对AL研究进行了关键词搜索,并通过搜索网站、会议论文集及后续查询进行了扩展。我们根据反映所使用的研究方法和所研究主题的类别对所得项目进行注释和编码。对于38项有定量数据的研究,我们进行了额外的比较,这些数据允许总结居民特征、环境以及入住和搬出模式。
所确定的411个项目涵盖大量主题。定性研究数量超过定量研究,纵向研究很少见。我们发现变量测量方式几乎没有标准化,这使得跨研究比较变得困难。随着AL研究变得越来越普遍,一些项目旨在研究在AL内部开展工作的方法,而不是对AL作为一个服务部门的价值进行全面评论。
AL的研究基础发展迅速,但仍不发达。我们建议在AL研究中使用更一致的标准化测量集,并基于这些进行报告分析。我们还建议在AL研究中更全面地报告抽样、时间框架和测量的详细信息。