Street Debra, Burge Stephanie, Quadagno Jill
Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Gerontologist. 2009 Apr;49(2):211-23. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp022. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
Most assisted living facility (ALF) residents are White widows in their mid- to late 80s who need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) because of frailty or cognitive decline. Yet, ALFs also serve younger individuals with physical disabilities, traumatic brain injury, or serious mental illness. We compare Florida ALFs with different licensure profiles by admission-discharge policies and resident population characteristics.
We use state administrative data and facility survey data from the Florida Study of Assisted Living (FSAL) to classify ALFs by licensure type and to determine how licensure influences ALF policies, practices, and resident population profiles.
Standard-licensed traditional ALFs primarily serve elderly White women with physical care needs and typically retain residents when their physical health deteriorates. Some ALFs that hold specialty licenses (extended congregate care and limited nursing services) offer extra physical care services and serve an older, more physically frail population with greater physical and cognitive challenges. ALFs with limited mental health (LMH) licenses serve clientele who are more racially and ethnically diverse, younger, and more likely to be men and single. LMH facilities also have a significant proportion of frail elder residents who live alongside these younger residents, including some who exhibit behavioral problems. LMH facilities also employ discharge policies that make it more difficult for frail elderly residents to age in place.
These differences by facility type raise important quality of life issues for both the frail elderly individuals and assisted living residents who do not fit the conventional demographic profile.
大多数辅助生活设施(ALF)的居民是80多岁中后期的白人寡妇,她们因身体虚弱或认知能力下降而需要日常生活活动(ADL)方面的帮助。然而,辅助生活设施也为患有身体残疾、创伤性脑损伤或严重精神疾病的年轻人提供服务。我们根据入院-出院政策和居民人口特征,比较佛罗里达州不同执照类型的辅助生活设施。
我们使用来自佛罗里达州辅助生活研究(FSAL)的州行政数据和设施调查数据,按执照类型对辅助生活设施进行分类,并确定执照如何影响辅助生活设施的政策、做法和居民人口概况。
标准执照的传统辅助生活设施主要为有身体护理需求的老年白人女性提供服务,并且当居民身体健康恶化时通常会留住他们。一些持有特殊执照(扩展集体护理和有限护理服务)的辅助生活设施提供额外的身体护理服务,服务的是年龄更大、身体更虚弱、身体和认知方面面临更大挑战的人群。持有有限心理健康(LMH)执照的辅助生活设施服务的客户在种族和民族上更加多样化,年龄更小,更有可能是男性和单身。LMH设施中也有相当比例的体弱老年居民与这些年轻居民住在一起,其中一些人表现出行为问题。LMH设施还采用出院政策,这使得体弱的老年居民更难原地养老。
设施类型的这些差异给体弱的老年人和不符合传统人口统计学特征的辅助生活居民都带来了重要的生活质量问题。