Rahme D M, Harris I A
St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2007 Dec;15(3):278-81. doi: 10.1177/230949900701500306.
To compare closed intramedullary nailing to open reduction and internal fixation using a fixed angle blade plate for the management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
58 patients were equally randomised to undergo either an intramedullary nailing (IN) or fixed angle blade plating (BP).
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to age, time to surgery, operating time, receipt of blood transfusions, duration of hospital stay, or fracture classification. The revision rate was 28% (8/29) in the BP group and none in the IN group; the difference was statistically significant.
Internal fixation using a fixed angle blade plate for subtrochanteric femoral fractures has higher implant failure and revision rates, compared to closed intramedullary nailing.
比较闭合髓内钉固定与使用角钢板切开复位内固定治疗股骨转子下骨折的效果。
58例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受髓内钉固定(IN)或角钢板固定(BP)。
两组在年龄、手术时间、手术时长、输血情况、住院时间或骨折分类方面无显著差异。BP组的翻修率为28%(8/29),IN组则无翻修病例;差异具有统计学意义。
与闭合髓内钉固定相比,使用角钢板内固定治疗股骨转子下骨折的植入物失败率和翻修率更高。