Caglar Omur, Aksoy Mehmet C, Yazici Muharrem, Surat Adil
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006 May;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000186642.91944.68.
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of compression plating and flexible intramedullary nailing for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Thirty-eight consecutive patients with 40 femoral shaft fractures were evaluated. Twenty-two femoral segments were treated with a compression plate and 18 femoral segments were treated with flexible intramedullary nailing. The time to healing, operation time and complications were evaluated. The average operation time was statistically significantly shorter in the nailing group (P=0.039). Four implant failures occurred in the compression plate group whereas one non-union was observed in the flexible nailing group. Flexible intramedullary nailing seems to provide a high union rate with a shorter operation time when compared with plate fixation.
本研究的目的是比较加压钢板固定和弹性髓内钉固定治疗小儿股骨干骨折的效果。对连续38例患有40个股骨干骨折的患者进行了评估。22个股骨节段采用加压钢板治疗,18个股骨节段采用弹性髓内钉治疗。评估愈合时间、手术时间和并发症。髓内钉固定组的平均手术时间在统计学上显著更短(P=0.039)。加压钢板组发生4例内植物失败,而弹性髓内钉组观察到1例骨不连。与钢板固定相比,弹性髓内钉固定似乎能提供更高的愈合率且手术时间更短