Green Alexis S, Grahame Nicholas J
Psychobiology of Addictions, Department of Psychology, Purdue School of Science, IUPUI, 402 North Blackford Street, LD 120F, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Alcohol. 2008 Feb;42(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.10.005.
Many studies have used voluntary ethanol consumption by animals to assess the influence of genetic and environmental manipulations on ethanol drinking. However, the relationship between home cage ethanol consumption and more formal assessments of ethanol-reinforced behavior using operant and instrumental conditioning procedures is not always clear. The present review attempted to evaluate whether there are consistent correlations between mouse and rat home cage ethanol drinking on the one hand, and either operant oral self-administration (OSA), conditioned taste aversion (CTA), or conditioned place preference (CPP) with ethanol on the other. We also review literature on intravenous ethanol self-administration (IVSA). To collect data, we evaluated a range of genetic manipulations that can change both genes and ethanol drinking behavior including selective breeding, transgenic and knockout models, and inbred and recombinant inbred strain panels. For a genetic model to be included in the analysis, there had to be published data resulting in differences on home cage drinking and data for at least one of the other behavioral measures. A consistent, positive correlation was observed between ethanol drinking and OSA, suggesting that instrumental behavior is closely genetically related to consummatory and ingestive behavior directed at ethanol. A negative correlation was observed between CTA and drinking, suggesting that ethanol's aversive actions may limit oral consumption of ethanol. A more modest, positive relationship was observed between drinking and CPP, and there were not enough studies available to determine a relationship with IVSA. That some consistent outcomes were observed between widely disparate behavioral procedures and genetic populations may increase confidence in the validity of findings from these assays. These findings may also have important implications when researchers decide which phenotypes to use in measuring alcohol-reward relevant behaviors in novel animal models.
许多研究利用动物自愿摄入乙醇来评估基因和环境操纵对乙醇饮用的影响。然而,笼内乙醇摄入量与使用操作性和工具性条件反射程序对乙醇强化行为进行的更正式评估之间的关系并不总是清晰的。本综述试图评估一方面小鼠和大鼠的笼内乙醇饮用与另一方面乙醇的操作性口腔自我给药(OSA)、条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)或条件性位置偏爱(CPP)之间是否存在一致的相关性。我们还综述了关于静脉内乙醇自我给药(IVSA)的文献。为了收集数据,我们评估了一系列能够改变基因和乙醇饮用行为的基因操纵,包括选择性育种、转基因和基因敲除模型,以及近交系和重组近交系群体。要将一个基因模型纳入分析,必须有已发表的数据表明其在笼内饮用方面存在差异,并且至少有一项其他行为测量的数据。在乙醇饮用与OSA之间观察到一致的正相关,这表明工具性行为在基因上与针对乙醇的 consummatory 和摄取行为密切相关。在CTA与饮用之间观察到负相关,这表明乙醇的厌恶作用可能会限制乙醇的口腔摄入量。在饮用与CPP之间观察到一种较为适度的正相关,并且没有足够的研究来确定与IVSA的关系。在广泛不同的行为程序和基因群体之间观察到一些一致的结果,这可能会增加对这些试验结果有效性的信心。当研究人员决定在新的动物模型中使用哪些表型来测量与酒精奖赏相关的行为时,这些发现可能也具有重要意义。