Esterman Michael, Prinzmetal William, DeGutis Joseph, Landau Ayelet, Hazeltine Eliot, Verstynen Timothy, Robertson Lynn
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Mar 7;46(4):1032-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.014. Epub 2007 Nov 23.
Do voluntary (endogenous) and involuntary (exogenous) attention have the same perceptual consequences? Here we used fMRI to examine activity in the fusiform face area (FFA--a region in ventral visual cortex responsive to faces) and frontal-parietal areas (dorsal regions involved in spatial attention) under voluntary and involuntary spatial cueing conditions. The trial and stimulus parameters were identical for both cueing conditions. However, the cue predicted the location of an upcoming target face in the voluntary condition but was nonpredictive in the involuntary condition. The predictable cue condition led to increased activity in the FFA compared to the nonpredictable cue condition. These results show that voluntary attention leads to more activity in areas of the brain associated with face processing than involuntary attention, and they are consistent with differential behavioral effects of attention on recognition-related processes.
自主(内源性)注意力和非自主(外源性)注意力是否会产生相同的感知结果?在此,我们利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检测在自主和非自主空间线索条件下梭状回面孔区(FFA——腹侧视觉皮层中对面孔有反应的一个区域)以及额顶叶区域(参与空间注意力的背侧区域)的活动。两种线索条件下的试验和刺激参数均相同。然而,在自主条件下线索可预测即将出现的目标面孔的位置,而在非自主条件下线索则无预测性。与不可预测线索条件相比,可预测线索条件导致FFA的活动增加。这些结果表明,与非自主注意力相比,自主注意力会使大脑中与面孔处理相关的区域产生更多活动,并且它们与注意力对识别相关过程的不同行为效应相一致。