de Marinis Filippo, Pereira Jose Rodrigues, Fossella Frank, Perry Michael C, Reck Martin, Salzberg Marc, Jassem Jacek, Peterson Patrick, Liepa Astra M, Moore Patti, Gralla Richard J
Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jan;3(1):30-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e8b48.
Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require care that emphasizes symptom palliation in addition to extending survival. The low response rates and minimal survival gains observed in second-line studies underscore the need to assess treatment efficacy with symptomatic end points.
To characterize the relationship between patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes and efficacy end points (tumor response, overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS]), retrospective analyses were performed on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) data (n = 488) from the phase III study of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) versus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in advanced NSCLC. The LCSS data consisted of patient ratings of six symptoms and three summary items using 100-mm visual analogue scales. The mean maximum improvement for each item was categorized according to best tumor response, with statistical analyses based on a two-factor interaction model (with treatment arm and response group as fixed factors). Additional analyses pooled data between treatment arms and examined correlation (nonparametric and Pearson's) of time to first worsening of symptoms (TWS) with PFS and OS.
All LCSS items, except hemoptysis, showed mean maximum improvement over baseline for responders and patients with stable disease (p < 0.01), with greater improvement associated with response. Median TWS for each LCSS item ranged between 2.3 months (fatigue) and 7.0 months (cough), with correlation between TWS and PFS and OS (all p values </=0.017).
For most NSCLC patients, second-line chemotherapy provides symptomatic improvement that is linked to standard efficacy outcomes. Health-related quality of life data provides complementary efficacy information that can guide routine clinical practice.
晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者除了延长生存期外,还需要注重症状缓解的治疗。二线研究中观察到的低缓解率和有限的生存期获益凸显了使用症状性终点评估治疗疗效的必要性。
为了描述患者报告的健康相关生活质量结果与疗效终点(肿瘤反应、总生存期[OS]、无进展生存期[PFS])之间的关系,对培美曲塞(500mg/m²,每3周1次)与多西他赛(75mg/m²,每3周1次)用于晚期NSCLC的III期研究中的肺癌症状量表(LCSS)数据(n = 488)进行了回顾性分析。LCSS数据包括患者使用100mm视觉模拟量表对六种症状和三个总结项目的评分。根据最佳肿瘤反应对每个项目的平均最大改善进行分类,并基于双因素交互模型(治疗组和反应组作为固定因素)进行统计分析。额外的分析汇总了治疗组之间的数据,并检查了症状首次恶化时间(TWS)与PFS和OS的相关性(非参数和Pearson相关性)。
除咯血外,所有LCSS项目在缓解者和病情稳定的患者中均显示出相对于基线的平均最大改善(p < 0.01),且改善程度与反应相关。每个LCSS项目的中位TWS在2.3个月(疲劳)至7.0个月(咳嗽)之间,TWS与PFS和OS之间存在相关性(所有p值≤0.017)。
对于大多数NSCLC患者,二线化疗可改善症状,且与标准疗效结果相关。健康相关生活质量数据提供了可指导常规临床实践的补充疗效信息。