Bader F, Setz J
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 May;46(5):346-8.
Traditional elastomeric impression materials, four recently developed "hydrophilic" silicones and a hydrocolloid have been tested for their accuracy of reproduction by use of indirect measurements via plaster dies and for their wettability by means of the sessile drop method. The new silicones are reproducing the original model as exactly as the traditional elastomers. The impression techniques have a stronger influence on the results than the impression materials. Although the new silicones are more hydrophilic than the traditional elastomers, they do not reach the wettability of a hydrocolloid. The results of the indirect measurements and the results of the contact angle measurements are corresponding to the results of other investigations and to literature data of bubble counts of plaster dies made of different impression materials.
通过石膏模型间接测量,对传统弹性印模材料、四种新研发的“亲水性”硅橡胶和一种水胶体的复制精度进行了测试,并采用静滴法对其润湿性进行了测试。新型硅橡胶复制原始模型的精确程度与传统弹性体相同。印模技术对结果的影响比印模材料更大。虽然新型硅橡胶比传统弹性体更具亲水性,但它们并未达到水胶体的润湿性。间接测量结果和接触角测量结果与其他研究结果以及不同印模材料制成的石膏模型气泡计数的文献数据相符。