Kong Chui-Hua, Hu Fei, Wang Peng, Wu Jing-Lun
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Mar;64(3):276-82. doi: 10.1002/ps.1521.
A number of techniques, including cultural management, allelopathy and bioherbicide, have been considered as alternatives for synthetic herbicides, but successful weed control will require the careful integration of these multiple techniques. This study was conducted to assess the use of allelopathic rice varieties in combination with cultural management options on paddy weeds, in order to develop an allelopathy-based technique to reduce herbicide use in paddies.
The weed-suppressive effects of the rice varieties tested varied highly with allelopathic trait, planting pattern and cultural management including planting density, flooding depth and duration and supply of nitrogen. Allelopathic rice varieties PI312777 and Huagan-1 demonstrated much stronger weed suppression than the non-allelopathic variety Huajianxian under the same planting pattern and cultural management. Their weed-suppressive effect was increased with cultural management options. In particular, if integrated cultural management options of allelopathic rice varieties included a low-dose (bensulfuron-methyl, 25 g AI ha(-1), a third of the recommended dose) herbicide application, the emergence and growth of most weeds found in paddy fields was completely controlled. No grain yield reduction for allelopathic varieties occurred under integrated cultural management options, whereas with the non-allelopathic variety a reduction of up to 45-60% was measurable even with the low-dose herbicide application.
The allelopathic potential of rice varieties will likely have a great impact on paddy weed control if integrated with cultural management options and application of low doses of herbicides. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce herbicide input in paddies if allelopathic rice is grown under integrated cultural management practices.
包括栽培管理、化感作用和生物除草剂在内的多种技术已被视为合成除草剂的替代方法,但要成功控制杂草,需要谨慎整合这些多种技术。本研究旨在评估化感水稻品种与稻田杂草栽培管理措施相结合的使用情况,以开发一种基于化感作用的技术,减少稻田除草剂的使用。
所测试水稻品种的杂草抑制效果因化感特性、种植模式和栽培管理措施(包括种植密度、淹水深度和持续时间以及氮肥供应)而有很大差异。在相同的种植模式和栽培管理条件下,化感水稻品种PI312777和华粳-1表现出比非化感品种华粳籼更强的杂草抑制能力。它们的杂草抑制效果随着栽培管理措施的实施而增强。特别是,如果化感水稻品种的综合栽培管理措施包括低剂量(苄嘧磺隆,25克有效成分/公顷,推荐剂量的三分之一)除草剂施用,则稻田中发现的大多数杂草的出苗和生长都能得到完全控制。在综合栽培管理措施下,化感品种的谷物产量没有降低,而对于非化感品种,即使施用低剂量除草剂,产量也可测量地降低高达45%-60%。
如果与栽培管理措施和低剂量除草剂施用相结合,水稻品种的化感潜力可能对稻田杂草控制产生重大影响。因此,如果在综合栽培管理实践下种植化感水稻,减少稻田除草剂投入是可行的。