Chibbaro Salvatore, Marsella Marco, Romano Antonio, Ippolito Salvatore, Benericetti Eugenio
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
J Neurosurg. 2008 Jan;108(1):74-9. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/01/0074.
Transtentorial brain herniation is a major cause of morbidity and death following severe closed head injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of selective uncoparahippocampectomy and tentorial splitting as an adjuvant method of treating otherwise uncontrollable elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) while attempting to prevent or minimize the devastating consequences caused by transtentorial herniation.
The authors retrospectively reviewed data from a series of 80 consecutive cases of severe closed head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 8) treated in their neurosurgical unit. All patients had elevated ICP and downward tentorial herniation, as documented with ICP monitoring, and clinical examination and computed tomography, respectively. Given the evidence of acute and ongoing neurological deterioration, all patients were treated with selective uncoparahippocampectomy and tentorial edge incision followed by wide decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty.
All injuries were caused by blunt trauma with signs of acute and/or progressive increased ICP causing downward transtentorial herniation. Fifty-eight patients were male and 22 were female with a mean age of 35 years and a mean preoperative GCS score of 5. Based on the current American Association of Neurological Surgeons guidelines for head trauma, an intraparenchymal ICP device (Camino, Integra) was placed in all patients who had a GCS score < 8, and ICP was consistently > 20 cm H2O. Whenever possible, risks and benefits were explained to family members, and then surgery was performed within 3-16 hours (median 6 hours). At a mean follow-up of 30 months, the outcome was favorable (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score of 4 or 5) in 60 patients (75%) and unfavorable (GOS score of 3) in 8 (10%), whereas the remaining 12 patients (15%) died at some point during the postoperative course. There was no survivor patient in a vegetative state. A younger age had a significant effect on positive outcome (p < 0.0005), as did an earlier operation (p < 0.04). The preoperative neurological status as assessed using the GCS as well as pupillary reactivity had no significant effect on outcome (p = 0.054 and p > 0.05, respectively).
A selective uncoparahippocampectomy with a tentorial edge incision and a wide decompressive craniectomy with duraplasty can be an effective adjuvant form of aggressive treatment to improve outcome in patients with severe closed head injury, especially in those who are younger if they are treated promptly.
经小脑幕脑疝是重度闭合性颅脑损伤后发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究的目的是评估选择性海马旁回切除术和小脑幕切开术作为一种辅助治疗方法的疗效,用于治疗其他方法无法控制的颅内压(ICP)升高,同时试图预防或尽量减少经小脑幕疝引起的灾难性后果。
作者回顾性分析了神经外科治疗的一系列连续80例重度闭合性颅脑损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评分<8)的数据。所有患者均有ICP升高和小脑幕下疝,分别通过ICP监测、临床检查和计算机断层扫描记录。鉴于存在急性和持续的神经功能恶化证据,所有患者均接受了选择性海马旁回切除术和小脑幕边缘切开术,随后进行了广泛的减压性颅骨切除术和硬脑膜成形术。
所有损伤均由钝性创伤引起,伴有急性和/或进行性ICP升高的迹象,导致小脑幕下疝。58例为男性,22例为女性,平均年龄35岁,术前平均GCS评分为5分。根据美国神经外科医师协会目前关于头部创伤的指南,所有GCS评分<8且ICP持续>20 cm H2O的患者均植入了脑实质内ICP装置(Camino,Integra)。只要有可能,就向家属解释风险和益处,然后在3 - 16小时(中位数6小时)内进行手术。平均随访30个月时,60例患者(75%)预后良好(格拉斯哥预后量表[GOS]评分为4或5),8例患者(10%)预后不良(GOS评分为3),其余12例患者(15%)在术后过程中的某个时间点死亡。没有处于植物人状态的存活患者。年龄较小对良好预后有显著影响(p < 0.0005),早期手术也有显著影响(p < 0.04)。使用GCS评估的术前神经状态以及瞳孔反应性对预后无显著影响(分别为p = 0.054和p > 0.05)。
选择性海马旁回切除术联合小脑幕边缘切开术以及广泛的减压性颅骨切除术联合硬脑膜成形术可以是一种有效的辅助积极治疗形式,以改善重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者的预后,特别是对于那些年轻且能及时接受治疗的患者。