Wiktorsson A M, Martinsson T, Zimmerman M
Department of Cariology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.
Swed Dent J. 1991;15(6):279-84.
The aims of this study was to compare the dental health status measured as the number of remaining teeth, also considering local fluoride administration in two sociologically equal communities with optimal and low drinking water fluoride concentrations. The study is based on self-answer enquiries and clinical examinations. To be part of the study the subjects were required to have used a drinking water with a fluoride concentration representative of the community for all their lives. The participants were 30-40 years old: 320 met the criteria in the optimal fluoride concentration community compared to 284 in the low fluoride community. Of these 18% did not turn up to the clinical examination. The results of the study show no differences in the number of still remaining teeth between optimal and low fluoride communities respectively. There were also no statistically significant differences as to the reasons for toothloss. The number of remaining teeth were neither influenced by local fluoride administration in the two groups. Removable dentures were only present in 0.9% with no differences between optimal and low fluoride communities.
本研究的目的是比较两个社会状况相同、饮用水氟浓度分别处于最佳水平和低水平的社区中,以剩余牙齿数量衡量的口腔健康状况,并考虑局部用氟情况。该研究基于自我回答式询问和临床检查。要参与该研究,受试者需终生饮用代表所在社区氟浓度的饮用水。参与者年龄在30至40岁之间:在最佳氟浓度社区有320人符合标准,而在低氟社区有284人符合标准。其中18%未参加临床检查。研究结果表明,最佳氟浓度社区和低氟社区的剩余牙齿数量分别无差异。在牙齿缺失原因方面也没有统计学上的显著差异。两组中剩余牙齿数量均不受局部用氟的影响。仅0.9%的人佩戴可摘义齿,最佳氟浓度社区和低氟社区之间无差异。