Suppr超能文献

分期颈动脉支架置入术和冠状动脉搭桥手术患者结局的系统评价。

A systematic review of outcomes in patients with staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

作者信息

Guzman Luis A, Costa Marco A, Angiolillo Dominick J, Zenni Martin, Wludyka Peter, Silliman Scott, Bass Theodore A

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2008 Feb;39(2):361-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495010. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although current guidelines state that carotid endarterectomy is probably recommended before or concomitant to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with carotid stenosis, significant controversies to this recommendation still persist. Carotid artery stenting has been recently introduced as an alternative revascularization modality in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to define, based on the published information, if carotid artery stenting is beneficial in this setting.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and a manual search of the literature from selected articles were performed. A total of 6 studies with 277 patients reporting carotid stenting followed by staged CABG were available for this clinical outcome analysis. All were retrospective and single-center studies.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69 years; 78% were males. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis was present in 76% of patients. The mean time to CABG was 32 days. The incidence of stroke and death associated with the stent procedure was 4.7%. Only 6 patients (2.2%) developed stroke associated with CABG. The overall combined 30-day event rate after CABG, including all events during carotid artery stenting, were as follows: minor stroke, 2.9%; major stroke, 3.2%; mortality, 7.6%; and combined death and any stroke, 12.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis, the combined incidence of death and stroke in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting and staged CABG remains elevated. These results confirm that the presence of carotid stenosis is per se a marker of risk that might persists independent of its treatment. A systematic or randomized evaluation appears warranted.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管当前指南指出,对于患有颈动脉狭窄的患者,可能建议在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)之前或同时进行颈动脉内膜切除术,但对此建议仍存在重大争议。最近,颈动脉支架置入术已被引入作为高危患者的一种替代性血管重建方式。本研究的目的是根据已发表的信息确定颈动脉支架置入术在此种情况下是否有益。

方法

检索了MEDLINE,并对选定文章的文献进行了人工检索。共有6项研究、277例患者报告了先进行颈动脉支架置入术然后分期进行CABG的情况,可用于此临床结局分析。所有研究均为回顾性单中心研究。

结果

平均年龄为69岁;78%为男性。76%的患者存在无症状性颈动脉狭窄。进行CABG的平均时间为32天。与支架置入手术相关的中风和死亡发生率为4.7%。只有6例患者(2.2%)发生了与CABG相关的中风。CABG后30天的总体综合事件发生率,包括颈动脉支架置入期间的所有事件,如下:轻度中风2.9%;重度中风3.2%;死亡率7.6%;死亡和任何中风合并发生率12.3%。

结论

在这项汇总分析中,接受颈动脉支架置入术和分期CABG的患者中,死亡和中风的综合发生率仍然很高。这些结果证实,颈动脉狭窄本身就是一种风险标志物,可能与其治疗无关而持续存在。似乎有必要进行系统或随机评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验