• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅对存在严重缺血性二尖瓣反流的患者进行多支冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术:4年随访

Multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting alone in patients with significant ischemic mitral regurgitation: a 4-year follow up.

作者信息

Ho Paul C, Nguyen Marie E

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Hawaii Region Kaiser Permanente, 3288 Moanalua Road, Honolulu, HI, 96819, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Jan;20(1):41-3.

PMID:18174619
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Is there a role for multivessel drug-eluting stenting alone in the treatment of patients with concomitant significant ischemic mitral regurgitation and coronary artery disease?

METHODS

In 2003, a single medical center in Honolulu, Hawaii, performed a total of 6 cases of coronary revascularization in patients with concomitant significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). All 6 patients had at least 3-4+ grade MR by echocardiography. All 6 patients had clinical presentation of myocardial ischemia. Of the 6 patients, 2 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone, 2 had coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone, and 2 had combined CABG + mitral valve repair (MVR). The patients were followed for 4 years for cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

Clinical follow up after the index procedure showed significant improvement in MR in all patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved in both the PCI-only patients, in 1 of 2 CABG-only patients and no improvement in the CABG + MVR group. Incomplete revascularization occurred in 1 patient in the PCI-only arm, both patients in the CABG arm and in 1 of 2 in the combined surgical arm. At 48 months, the only endpoint observed was 1 cardiac death in the CABG-only arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivessel PCI with drug-eluting stents appears to be an acceptable first treatment for patients with concomitant severe multivessel coronary artery disease and ischemic MR. For those with no improvement in MR after PCI, MVR can be a later hybrid procedure.

摘要

目的

单纯多支血管药物洗脱支架置入术在治疗合并严重缺血性二尖瓣反流和冠状动脉疾病的患者中是否有作用?

方法

2003年,夏威夷檀香山的一家医疗中心对6例合并严重缺血性二尖瓣反流(MR)的患者进行了冠状动脉血运重建。所有6例患者经超声心动图检查均有至少3 - 4+级的MR。所有6例患者均有心肌缺血的临床表现。6例患者中,2例仅接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),2例仅接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),2例接受CABG联合二尖瓣修复术(MVR)。对患者进行了4年的随访,观察心脏死亡、心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建情况。

结果

首次手术后的临床随访显示所有患者的MR均有显著改善。仅接受PCI的患者以及2例仅接受CABG的患者中的1例左心室射血分数有所改善,而CABG + MVR组无改善。仅接受PCI组的1例患者、CABG组的2例患者以及联合手术组的2例患者中的1例发生了不完全血运重建。在48个月时,观察到的唯一终点事件是仅接受CABG组有1例心脏死亡。

结论

对于合并严重多支血管冠状动脉疾病和缺血性MR的患者,多支血管药物洗脱支架PCI似乎是一种可接受的初始治疗方法。对于PCI后MR无改善的患者,MVR可作为后期的杂交手术。

相似文献

1
Multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting alone in patients with significant ischemic mitral regurgitation: a 4-year follow up.仅对存在严重缺血性二尖瓣反流的患者进行多支冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术:4年随访
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Jan;20(1):41-3.
2
Moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease: Impact of different treatment on survival and rehospitalization.中重度缺血性二尖瓣反流与多支冠状动脉疾病:不同治疗方法对生存及再住院率的影响
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 28;111(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.035. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
3
Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians.八旬老人非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗中冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非随机对照比较
Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2374-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727099. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
4
PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics.糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):50-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21757.
5
Survival after coronary revascularization, with and without mitral valve surgery, in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.缺血性二尖瓣反流患者在接受或未接受二尖瓣手术情况下进行冠状动脉血运重建后的生存率。
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108 Suppl 1:II103-10. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087656.10829.df.
6
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome?慢性血液透析患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:药物洗脱支架对临床结局有影响吗?
J Card Surg. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):234-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00789.x.
7
Multivessel coronary revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up of the ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的多支冠状动脉血运重建:ARTS-II(动脉血运重建治疗研究 - 第二部分)试验的3年随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):1957-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.010.
8
Mitral valve repair versus revascularization alone in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation.二尖瓣修复术与单纯血运重建术治疗缺血性二尖瓣反流的比较。
Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I499-503. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000398.
9
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
10
Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation grade II-III: correction in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing simultaneous coronary revascularization.缺血性二尖瓣反流Ⅱ-Ⅲ级:左心室功能受损且同时接受冠状动脉血运重建患者的矫正治疗。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Nov;10(6):754-62.