Suppr超能文献

根据改良的日本综合分期评分选择肝细胞癌的治疗方式。

Selection of treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the modified Japan Integrated Staging score.

作者信息

Nanashima Atsushi, Masuda Junichi, Miuma Satoshi, Sumida Yorihisa, Nonaka Takashi, Tanaka Kenji, Hidaka Shigekazu, Sawai Terumitsu, Nagayasu Takeshi

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan 7;14(1):58-63. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.58.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the prognosis of patients who underwent hepatectomy and ablation using the modified Japan Integrated Staging score (mJIS).

METHODS

We examined the clinicopathologic records and patient outcomes in 278 HCC patients including 226 undergoing hepatectomy and 52 undergoing ablation therapy.

RESULTS

Cirrhosis was more frequent in the ablation group. Tumor size, number and presence of vascular invasion were significantly higher in the operation group compared to the ablation group. The local recurrence rate adjacent to treated lesions was significantly higher in the ablation group compared to the operation group (P < 0.05). The 3- and 5-year survival rates in the ablation and the operation group were 66% and 78%, and 50% and 63%, respectively, but not significantly different. Over 50% survival rates were observed in patients with a mJIS score of 0-2 in both groups. However, survival rates with a score of 3-5 in both groups were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

According to the mJIS system, both local treatments could be selected for patients with a score of 0-2. However, for patients with a score more than 3, liver transplantation might be a better option in patients with HCC.

摘要

目的

使用改良日本综合分期系统(mJIS)比较接受肝切除术和消融术患者的预后。

方法

我们检查了278例肝癌患者的临床病理记录和患者预后,其中226例接受肝切除术,52例接受消融治疗。

结果

消融组肝硬化更为常见。与消融组相比,手术组的肿瘤大小、数量和血管侵犯情况明显更高。与手术组相比,消融组治疗部位附近的局部复发率明显更高(P<0.05)。消融组和手术组的3年和5年生存率分别为66%和78%,以及50%和63%,但差异不显著。两组中mJIS评分为0-2的患者生存率超过50%。然而,两组中评分为3-5的患者生存率明显较低。

结论

根据mJIS系统,评分为0-2的患者可以选择两种局部治疗方法。然而,对于评分超过3的患者,肝移植可能是肝癌患者更好的选择。

相似文献

3
An accurate prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy.
Int J Oncol. 2015 Mar;46(3):944-52. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2798. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Post-hepatectomy survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):246-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.246.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma.
J Glob Infect Dis. 2009 Jan;1(1):33-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.52979.
2
Relationship between microvessel count and post-hepatectomy survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug 21;14(31):4915-22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4915.

本文引用的文献

2
Intrahepatic tumor recurrence after partial hepatectomy: value of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000239106.98853.B8.
3
4
Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of combined interventional therapy for 1126 cases of primary liver cancer.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 21;12(31):5060-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.5060.
9
Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first evidence based guidelines from Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 7;12(5):828-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i5.828.
10
Long-term outcomes of hepatectomy vs percutaneous ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma < or =4 cm.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 28;12(4):546-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i4.546.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验