Long-term outcomes of hepatectomy vs percutaneous ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma < or =4 cm.

AIM

To determine which treatment modality--hepatectomy or percutaneous ablation--is more beneficial for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (< or =4 cm) in terms of long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 149 patients with HCC < or =4 cm was conducted. Eighty-five patients underwent partial hepatectomy (anatomic in 47 and non-anatomic in 38) and 64 underwent percutaneous ablation (percutaneous ethanol injection in 37, radiofrequency ablation in 21, and microwave coagulation in 6). The median follow-up period was 69 mo.

RESULTS

Hepatectomy was associated with larger tumor size (P<0.001), whereas percutaneous ablation was significantly associated with impaired hepatic functional reserve. Local recurrence was less frequent following hepatectomy (P<0.0001). Survival was better following hepatectomy (median survival time: 122 mo) than following percutaneous ablation (median survival time: 66 mo; P=0.0123). When tumor size was divided into < or =2 cm vs >2 cm, the favorable effects of hepatectomy on long-term survival was seen only in patients with tumors>2 cm (P=0.0001). The Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that hepatectomy (P=0.006) and tumors < or =2 cm (P=0.017) were independently associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy provides both better local control and better long-term survival for patients with HCC < or =4 cm compared with percutaneous ablation. Of the patients with HCC < or =4 cm, those with tumors >2 cm are good candidates for hepatectomy, provided that the hepatic functional reserve of the patient permits resection.