Suppr超能文献

[不同类型牙垫对牙/种植体支持式固定桥中种植体及基牙的影响]

[The effect of bedding type on implant and abutment tooth in tooth/implant-supported bridgework].

作者信息

Krämer A, Weber H

机构信息

Zentrums für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Oct;46(10):686-8.

PMID:1817863
Abstract

17 distal extension cases were treated with IMZ implants supporting a fixed-removable bridge connected to a natural tooth abutment with a precision attachment. Instead of the polyoxmethylene internal shock absorber an identically dimensioned titanium element was incorporated in the implants of every second patient. Patients were monitored on a recall schedule. Implant and tooth mobility, pocket probing depth, and bone loss were the parameters evaluated. The results after a mean incorporation time of 16.5 months indicate that, at least during this initial time of function, there are no differences between a mobile and rigid bedding of the superstructure on the implants.

摘要

17例远中延伸病例采用IMZ种植体支持固定-可摘桥修复,该桥通过精密附着体与天然牙基牙相连。每隔一位患者的种植体中,用尺寸相同的钛元件取代了聚甲醛内部减震器。按照回访计划对患者进行监测。评估的参数包括种植体和牙齿的松动度、牙周袋探诊深度以及骨吸收情况。平均植入时间16.5个月后的结果表明,至少在功能的最初这段时间内,上部结构在种植体上采用活动式或固定式衬垫并无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验