Suppr超能文献

血管收缩和血管舒张对左心室及节段性循环能量代谢的影响。

Effects of vasoconstriction and vasodilatation on LV and segmental circulatory energetics.

作者信息

Wang Jiun-Jr, Shrive Nigel G, Parker Kim H, Tyberg John V

机构信息

Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AL, Canada T2N 4N1.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Mar;294(3):H1216-25. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00983.2007. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

Abstract

Although the hydraulic work generated by the left ventricle (LV) is not disputed, how the work was dissipated through the systemic circulation is still subject to interpretation. Recently, we proposed that the systemic circulation should be considered as waves and a reservoir system (Wk). By combining the arterial and venous reservoirs, the systemic vascular resistance can be viewed as a series of resistors, which in sequence are the large-artery resistance, arterial reservoir resistance, the microcirculatory resistance, venous reservoir resistance, and large-vein resistance, and propelling blood through these resistance elements represents resistive losses. We then studied the changes in the fraction of the work consumed by each element when infusing methoxamine (MTX), a vasoconstrictor, and sodium nitroprusside (NP), a vasodilator. Results show that, under control condition, approximately 50% of the LV stroke work was dissipated through arterial reservoir resistance (NP, approximately 36%; MTX, approximately 27%), another approximately 25% was dissipated by the microcirculation (NP, approximately 20%; MTX, approximately 66%), and approximately 20% of work by the large-artery resistances (NP, approximately 37%; MTX, approximately 6%). The energy dissipated by the venous resistances was small and had limited variation with NP and MTX, where the large-vein and venous reservoir resistances shared approximately 1 and approximately 3% of LV stroke work, respectively. Approximately 60% of LV stroke work is stored as the potential energy during systole under control, and the ratio decreases to approximately 45% with NP and approximately 80% with MTX.

摘要

尽管左心室(LV)产生的液压功并无争议,但该功如何通过体循环耗散仍有待解读。最近,我们提出应将体循环视为波和储器系统(Wk)。通过合并动脉和静脉储器,体循环血管阻力可被视为一系列电阻器,依次为大动脉阻力、动脉储器阻力、微循环阻力、静脉储器阻力和大静脉阻力,推动血液通过这些阻力元件代表着阻力损耗。然后,我们研究了输注血管收缩剂甲氧明(MTX)和血管扩张剂硝普钠(NP)时各元件所消耗功的比例变化。结果显示,在对照条件下,约50%的左心室搏功通过动脉储器阻力耗散(NP约为36%;MTX约为27%),另外约25%通过微循环耗散(NP约为20%;MTX约为66%),约20%的功通过大动脉阻力耗散(NP约为37%;MTX约为6%)。静脉阻力所耗散的能量较小,且随NP和MTX的变化有限,其中大静脉和静脉储器阻力分别约占左心室搏功的1%和约3%。在对照条件下,约60%的左心室搏功在收缩期作为势能储存,使用NP时该比例降至约45%,使用MTX时降至约80%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验