Pollock Carol, Johnson David Wayne, Hörl Walter H, Rossert Jerome, Casadevall Nicole, Schellekens Huub, Delage Robert, De Francisco Angel, Macdougall Iain, Thorpe Robin, Toffelmire Edwin
Department of Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Department of Medicine, Pacific Highway, Street Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):193-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02440607.
Pure red cell aplasia in patients who are treated for anemia of chronic kidney disease with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents such as epoetin was first reported in 1998. Although the incidence of pure red cell aplasia peaked in 2002, it remains important for nephrologists to know how to investigate a suspected case of pure red cell aplasia and how to identify other causes of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, which account for the vast majority of such cases. The authors reviewed the current status of information in the literature and drew on their personal experiences with patients regarding the diagnosis and management of epoetin-induced pure red cell aplasia. The mechanism for development of epoetin-induced pure red cell aplasia remains unconfirmed. It generally occurs after the production of neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies. Elucidation of a suspected pure red cell aplasia case requires a systematic approach, beginning with simple measurements such as blood cell counts, because most cases of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness are attributable to other causes. If these criteria indicate that the patient's response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy is very poor, then bone marrow examination and measurement of anti-erythropoietin antibodies is justified. If pure red cell aplasia is confirmed, then cessation of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are recommended. Continued study of epoetin-induced pure red cell aplasia is needed to help nephrologists prevent or manage future cases and will have implications for the use of other protein-based therapeutic agents.
1998年首次报道了接受促红细胞生成素等促红细胞生成剂治疗慢性肾脏病贫血的患者出现纯红细胞再生障碍。尽管纯红细胞再生障碍的发病率在2002年达到峰值,但肾病学家了解如何调查疑似纯红细胞再生障碍病例以及如何识别对促红细胞生成剂反应低下的其他原因(此类病例中的绝大多数)仍然很重要。作者回顾了文献中的信息现状,并借鉴了他们在诊断和管理促红细胞生成素诱导的纯红细胞再生障碍患者方面的个人经验。促红细胞生成素诱导的纯红细胞再生障碍的发病机制仍未得到证实。它通常在产生中和性抗促红细胞生成素抗体后发生。对疑似纯红细胞再生障碍病例的诊断需要一种系统的方法,从血细胞计数等简单测量开始,因为大多数促红细胞生成剂反应低下的病例归因于其他原因。如果这些标准表明患者对促红细胞生成剂治疗的反应非常差,那么进行骨髓检查和抗促红细胞生成素抗体检测是合理的。如果确诊为纯红细胞再生障碍,建议停止促红细胞生成剂治疗并开始免疫抑制治疗。需要继续研究促红细胞生成素诱导的纯红细胞再生障碍,以帮助肾病学家预防或处理未来的病例,并将对其他基于蛋白质的治疗药物的使用产生影响。