Ott R W
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen.
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Nov;46(11):762-5.
Six methods of assessing the resting position were evaluated in this study of 22 patients with teeth and 10 edentulous patients. None of these methods yielded reproducible results. The resting position is not a fixed, constant value, but depends on the method used. As could be shown by means of the standard deviation the method used to determine the resting position has a considerable influence on the distribution, and hence on the margin of error when the vertical relation is being determined. Small ranges of distribution were achieved: a) by means of the closest speaking distance when the patient spoke the numbers from 60 to 70 in a natural voice, b) after prompt relaxation of the lower jaw when the patients were asked to relax their jaws, c) when the interocclusal distance was measured after the mouth had been opened a little and the lips subsequently touched again lightly. Since there is little difference in the values with any one patient the three methods can be recommended for practical use.
在这项针对22名有牙患者和10名无牙患者的研究中,对六种评估休息位的方法进行了评估。这些方法均未得出可重复的结果。休息位不是一个固定不变的值,而是取决于所使用的方法。通过标准差可以看出,用于确定休息位的方法对分布有相当大的影响,因此在确定垂直关系时对误差范围也有影响。分布范围较小的情况有:a)当患者用自然声音说出60到70的数字时,通过最近说话距离来确定;b)当要求患者放松下颌后,下颌迅速放松时;c)当嘴巴稍微张开后再轻轻合上嘴唇,测量咬合间距离时。由于同一患者的这些值差异不大,这三种方法可推荐用于实际操作。