Du Lanying, Zhao Guangyu, Lin Yongping, Sui Hongyan, Chan Chris, Ma Selene, He Yuxian, Jiang Shibo, Wu Changyou, Yuen Kwok-Yung, Jin Dong-Yan, Zhou Yusen, Zheng Bo-Jian
Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Immunol. 2008 Jan 15;180(2):948-56. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.948.
We have previously reported that a subunit protein vaccine based on the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike protein and a recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-based RBD (RBD-rAAV) vaccine could induce highly potent neutralizing Ab responses in immunized animals. In this study, systemic, mucosal, and cellular immune responses and long-term protective immunity induced by RBD-rAAV were further characterized in a BALB/c mouse model, with comparison of the i.m. and intranasal (i.n.) routes of administration. Our results demonstrated that: 1) the i.n. vaccination induced a systemic humoral immune response of comparable strength and shorter duration than the i.m. vaccination, but the local humoral immune response was much stronger; 2) the i.n. vaccination elicited stronger systemic and local specific cytotoxic T cell responses than the i.m. vaccination, as evidenced by higher prevalence of IL-2 and/or IFN-gamma-producing CD3+/CD8+ T cells in both lungs and spleen; 3) the i.n. vaccination induced similar protection as the i.m. vaccination against SARS-CoV challenge in mice; 4) higher titers of mucosal IgA and serum-neutralizing Ab were associated with lower viral load and less pulmonary pathological damage, while no Ab-mediated disease enhancement effect was observed; and 5) the vaccination could provide long-term protection against SARS-CoV infection. Taken together, our findings suggest that RBD-rAAV can be further developed into a vaccine candidate for prevention of SARS and that i.n. vaccination may be the preferred route of administration due to its ability to induce SARS-CoV-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses and its better safety profile.
我们之前曾报道,基于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)刺突蛋白受体结合域(RBD)的亚单位蛋白疫苗以及基于重组腺相关病毒(rAAV)的RBD(RBD-rAAV)疫苗可在免疫动物中诱导高效的中和抗体反应。在本研究中,我们在BALB/c小鼠模型中进一步表征了RBD-rAAV诱导的全身、黏膜和细胞免疫反应以及长期保护性免疫,并比较了肌肉注射(i.m.)和鼻内(i.n.)给药途径。我们的结果表明:1)鼻内接种诱导的全身体液免疫反应强度与肌肉注射相当,但持续时间较短,而局部体液免疫反应更强;2)鼻内接种比肌肉注射引发更强的全身和局部特异性细胞毒性T细胞反应,这在肺和脾中产生IL-2和/或IFN-γ的CD3+/CD8+ T细胞的更高流行率中得到证明;3)鼻内接种在小鼠中诱导的针对SARS-CoV攻击的保护作用与肌肉注射相似;4)更高滴度的黏膜IgA和血清中和抗体与更低的病毒载量和更少的肺部病理损伤相关,同时未观察到抗体介导的疾病增强效应;5)接种疫苗可提供针对SARS-CoV感染的长期保护。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,RBD-rAAV可进一步开发成为预防SARS的候选疫苗,并且鼻内接种可能是首选给药途径,因为它能够诱导SARS-CoV特异性的全身和黏膜免疫反应,且安全性更好。