[Clinical comparative study of local anesthetics. Random double blind study with four commercial preparations]. - Suppr | 超能文献

[Clinical comparative study of local anesthetics. Random double blind study with four commercial preparations].

作者信息

Khoury F, Hinterthan A, Schürmann J, Arns H

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, und Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie der Westfalischen Wilhelms-Universität Munster.

出版信息

Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Dec;46(12):822-4.

Abstract

In a randomized double blind study effects and tolerability of the local anesthetics Prilocaine 3% with Felypressin, Articaine 4% with Epinephrine 1/200,000 and 1/100,000, and Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine 1/100,000 were tested. There was no significant difference between the four agents as far as effect on blood pressure, pulse, and tissue rehabilitation are concerned. Prilocaine can be used for extractions and surgical tooth removal. It can not be recommended for apicoectomy or implantation. The better results of Articaine 4% compared to Lidocaine 2% were statistically not significant.

摘要

相似文献

1

[Clinical comparative study of local anesthetics. Random double blind study with four commercial preparations].

Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Dec;46(12):822-4.

2

Lidocaine and prilocaine with vasoconstrictors as cause for cardiovascular reactions. A pulse oximetric study. Preliminary report.

Oral Surg Oral Diagn. 1996;7:21-4.

3

Influence of local anesthethics with adrenalina 1:100.000 in basic vital constants during third molar surgery.

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Jul 1;13(7):E431-7.

4

On felypressin (octapressin) as an adjunct to lidocaine and prilocaine--an experimental study in animals.

Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1966;24(4):377-88.

5

The cardiovascular effect of local anesthesia with articaine plus 1:200,000 adrenalin versus lidocaine plus 1:100,000 adrenalin in medically compromised cardiac patients: a prospective, randomized, double blinded study.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jun;105(6):725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.005.

6

Hemodynamic changes comparing 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000 in lower third molar surgery.

J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jul;23(4):1204-11. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824f66a0.

7

Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.

Gen Dent. 2006 May-Jun;54(3):168-71.

8

Pulsioxymetry monitorization during lower third molar extraction. A comparative study of three local anesthetics with epinephrine 1:100,000.

Med Oral. 2001 May-Jul;6(3):195-204.

9

Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.

J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

10

The influence of two different dental local anaesthetic solutions on the haemodynamic responses of children undergoing restorative dentistry: a randomised, single-blind, split-mouth study.

Br Dent J. 2001 May 12;190(9):502-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801015.

引用本文的文献

1

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(7):CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2.

2

Cardiovascular Parameters during Submaximal Exercise following Submucous Administration of Articaine : A Comparison with Lidocaine and Placebo in Young Healthy Volunteers.

Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(4):219-23. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323040-00001.

3

Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine.

Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):417-25. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。