Dickens Steven, Beane Richard A, Caplan Daniel J, Vann William
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB #7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2008 Summer;68(3):167-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00059.x.
Treatment result and compliance for orthodontic Medicaid patients were assessed and compared to non-Medicaid patients of similar initial severity. All 55 North Carolina practices providing orthodontic treatment covered by Medicaid were asked to submit their last five Medicaid cases and five non-Medicaid cases of similar initial treatment complexity Nine practices agreed to participate. Initial models, final models, and progress notes were obtained for all subjects. Casts were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index to assess initial and posttreatment orthodontic status, and progress notes were reviewed for compliance data. No clinically important differences were seen between the Medicaid and non-Medicaid groups with respect to initial PAR, final PAR, percent PAR reduction, broken appointments, broken appliances, or poor oral hygiene. In this study, Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients did not differ substantially with respect to effectiveness of treatment received or their compliance with treatment.
对接受正畸医疗补助的患者的治疗结果和依从性进行了评估,并与初始严重程度相似的非医疗补助患者进行了比较。要求北卡罗来纳州所有提供正畸医疗补助治疗的55家医疗机构提交其最近的5例医疗补助病例和5例初始治疗复杂性相似的非医疗补助病例。9家医疗机构同意参与。获取了所有受试者的初始模型、最终模型和进展记录。使用同行评估评分(PAR)指数对模型进行评分,以评估正畸治疗的初始和治疗后状况,并审查进展记录以获取依从性数据。在初始PAR、最终PAR、PAR降低百分比、预约中断、矫治器损坏或口腔卫生差方面,医疗补助组和非医疗补助组之间未观察到临床上的重要差异。在本研究中,医疗补助患者和非医疗补助患者在接受治疗的有效性或对治疗的依从性方面没有显著差异。