Santos M
Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Grup de Biologia Evolutiva (GBE), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain.
J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):625-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01484.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
In the 'mating pool' mode of reproduction, offspring genotypes at each generation are taken randomly from a common population and subdivided into groups where individuals representing a finite sample from the pooled distribution reproduce proportional to their fitness. Assuming that genetically diverse groups contribute more offspring, a recent article by Nonacs & Kapheim [J. Evol. Biol. 20 (2007) 2253] shows that allelic diversity can be easily maintained and proposes the process of 'social heterosis' as a potentially powerful mechanism that accounts for a significant amount of genetic variation. Contrary to their suggestions, I show here that there is a reduced efficiency of selection and an increased probability of fixation of segregating alleles when many loci are simultaneously undergoing social heterosis even if independence of action of the different loci and linkage equilibrium are assumed. The critical issue is that linkage disequilibria are generated by the sampling process of creating small groups and interfere with selection.
在“交配库”繁殖模式中,每一代的后代基因型都从一个共同的种群中随机选取,并被细分为若干组,在这些组中,代表来自混合分布的有限样本的个体按其适合度进行繁殖。假设基因多样化的组贡献更多后代,诺纳克斯和卡普海姆最近发表的一篇文章[《进化生物学杂志》20(2007)2253]表明,等位基因多样性可以很容易地维持,并提出“社会杂种优势”过程是一种潜在的强大机制,可解释大量的遗传变异。与他们的观点相反,我在此表明,即使假设不同基因座的作用相互独立且处于连锁平衡状态,当许多基因座同时经历社会杂种优势时,选择效率会降低,分离等位基因固定的概率会增加。关键问题在于,连锁不平衡是由创建小群体的抽样过程产生的,并会干扰选择。