Reiley Carol E, Akinbiyi Takintope, Burschka Darius, Chang David C, Okamura Allison M, Yuh David D
Engineering Research Center and Computer Integrated Surgery Systems and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jan;135(1):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.043.
Direct haptic (force or tactile) feedback is negligible in current surgical robotic systems. The relevance of haptic feedback in robot-assisted performances of surgical tasks is controversial. We studied the effects of visual force feedback, a haptic feedback surrogate, on tying surgical knots with fine sutures similar to those used in cardiovascular surgery.
By using a modified da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) equipped with force-sensing instrument tips and real-time visual force feedback overlays in the console image, 10 surgeons each tied 10 knots with and 10 knots without visual force feedback. Four surgeons had significant prior da Vinci experience, and the remaining 6 surgeons did not. Performance parameters, including suture breakage and secure knots, peak and standard deviation of applied forces, and completion times using 5-0 silk sutures, were recorded. Chi-square and Student t test analyses determined the differences between groups.
Among surgeon subjects with robotic experience, no differences in measured performance parameters were found between robot-assisted knot ties executed with and without visual force feedback. Among surgeons without robotic experience, however, visual force feedback was associated with lower suture breakage rates, peak applied forces, and standard deviations of applied forces. Visual force feedback did not impart differences in knot completion times or loose knots for either surgeon group.
Visual force feedback resulted in reduced suture breakage, lower forces, and decreased force inconsistencies among novice robotic surgeons, although elapsed time and knot quality were unaffected. In contrast, visual force feedback did not affect these metrics among surgeons experienced with the da Vinci system. These results suggest that visual force feedback primarily benefits novice robot-assisted surgeons, with diminishing benefits among experienced surgeons.
在当前的手术机器人系统中,直接触觉(力或触觉)反馈可忽略不计。触觉反馈在机器人辅助手术任务执行中的相关性存在争议。我们研究了视觉力反馈(一种触觉反馈替代物)对使用类似于心血管手术中所用的精细缝线打结的影响。
使用配备有力传感器械尖端和控制台图像中实时视觉力反馈叠加层的改良达芬奇机器人系统(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔),10名外科医生分别在有视觉力反馈和无视觉力反馈的情况下各打10个结。4名外科医生有丰富的达芬奇手术经验,其余6名外科医生则没有。记录了性能参数,包括缝线断裂和牢固的结、施加力的峰值和标准差以及使用5-0丝线缝线的完成时间。卡方检验和学生t检验分析确定了组间差异。
在有机器人手术经验的外科医生受试者中,在有视觉力反馈和无视觉力反馈情况下进行的机器人辅助打结操作中,所测量的性能参数没有差异。然而,在没有机器人手术经验的外科医生中,视觉力反馈与较低的缝线断裂率、施加力的峰值和标准差相关。视觉力反馈在两组外科医生的打结完成时间或松结方面没有产生差异。
视觉力反馈可减少新手机器人外科医生的缝线断裂、降低用力,并减少用力不一致情况,尽管所用时间和结的质量未受影响。相比之下,视觉力反馈对有达芬奇系统手术经验的外科医生的这些指标没有影响。这些结果表明,视觉力反馈主要使新手机器人辅助外科医生受益,而对有经验的外科医生的益处逐渐减少。