• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性支架内再狭窄病变的重复支架置入术:血管内超声分析及临床结果

Repeated stenting of recurrent in-stent restenotic lesions: intravascular ultrasound analysis and clinical outcome.

作者信息

Kim Sang-Wook, Mintz Gary S, Lee Kwang-Je, Pregowski Jerzy, Tyczynski Pawel, Escolar Esteban, Michalek Aleksandra, Lu Li, Pichard Augusto D, Satler Lowell F, Suddath William O, Waksman Ron, Weissman Neil J

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, 100 Irving Street, N.W., Suite EB 5123, Washington, D.C., 20010, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Dec;19(12):506-9.

PMID:18180519
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stents are used to treat the first and even successive episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

In 18 patients (19 lesions), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after placement of a stent for a nonrestenotic lesion after the second stent was used to treat the first episode of ISR and after the third stent was used to treat the second episode of ISR. The duration between the first and second stent was 355 +/- 374 days, and between the second and third stent was 330 +/- 279 days. The duration of follow up after the third stent was 307 +/- 145 days. High-pressure inflation (> 14 atm) was performed for 69% (11/16) of patients when treating the first episode of ISR, and all patients when treating the re-ISR (p = 0.018).

RESULTS

Nevertheless, vessel area and final minimal stent area (MSA) did not increase with successive restenting, and the ratio of minimum stent diameter to nominal stent size suggested that chronic stent underexpansion persisted. MSA > 5 mm2 was noted in 54% after the first stent, 35% after the second stent, and 42% after the third stent (p = 0.6). After the third stent, the rate of target lesion revascularization was 26% (5/19) and target vessel revascularization was 37% (7/19); there was 1 nonfatal myocardial infarction. Thus, the overall rate of major adverse cardiac events was 42%.

CONCLUSION

While serial restenting a recurrent ISR lesion was not associated with progressive decrease in MSA, it was still associated with chronic stent underexpansion and a high rate of adverse events. Attention should be directed to achieving better stent expansion to minimize subsequent recurrences.

摘要

背景

支架用于治疗支架内再狭窄(ISR)的首次甚至后续发作。

方法

在18例患者(19处病变)中,于置入一枚支架治疗非再狭窄病变后,在使用第二枚支架治疗首次ISR发作后以及使用第三枚支架治疗第二次ISR发作后,进行血管内超声(IVUS)检查。第一枚和第二枚支架置入的间隔时间为355±374天,第二枚和第三枚支架置入的间隔时间为330±279天。第三枚支架置入后的随访时间为307±145天。在治疗首次ISR发作时,69%(11/16)的患者进行了高压扩张(>14个大气压),而在治疗再发ISR时所有患者均进行了高压扩张(p = 0.018)。

结果

然而,连续再次置入支架时血管面积和最终最小支架面积(MSA)并未增加,最小支架直径与标称支架尺寸的比值表明慢性支架扩张不足持续存在。第一枚支架置入后54%的患者MSA>5 mm²,第二枚支架置入后为35%,第三枚支架置入后为42%(p = 0.6)。第三枚支架置入后,靶病变血管重建率为26%(5/19),靶血管血管重建率为37%(7/19);发生1例非致命性心肌梗死。因此,主要不良心脏事件的总体发生率为42%。

结论

虽然对复发性ISR病变进行连续再次置入支架与MSA的逐渐降低无关,但仍与慢性支架扩张不足和高不良事件发生率相关。应致力于实现更好的支架扩张以尽量减少后续复发。

相似文献

1
Repeated stenting of recurrent in-stent restenotic lesions: intravascular ultrasound analysis and clinical outcome.复发性支架内再狭窄病变的重复支架置入术:血管内超声分析及临床结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Dec;19(12):506-9.
2
Comparison between sirolimus-eluting stents and intracoronary catheter-based beta radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉内导管介导的β射线治疗支架内再狭窄的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Dec 15;96(12):1656-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.081. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
3
Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease.对 403 例无保护左主干病变患者的支架面积进行全面的血管内超声评估及其对再狭窄和不良心脏事件的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Dec 1;4(6):562-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.964643. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
4
Rotational atherectomy for in-stent restenosis: acute and long-term results of the first 100 cases.冠状动脉内斑块旋切术治疗支架内再狭窄:首批100例患者的急性和长期结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1358-65. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00382-9.
5
Intravascular ultrasound-guided high-pressure balloon predilatation for optimal drug-eluting stent deployment in restenosis of a stent implanted 7 years earlier. Do we know the right technique for in-stent restenosis restenting?血管内超声引导下高压球囊预扩张用于7年前植入支架再狭窄时优化药物洗脱支架置入。我们是否掌握了支架内再狭窄再次置入支架的正确技术?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 May;20(5):E139-45.
6
Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.采用非激进植入技术输送西罗莫司洗脱支架的血管反应:多中心随机E-SIRIUS和SIRIUS试验的血管内超声结果比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Dec;66(4):499-506. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20542.
7
Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗支架内再狭窄后,支架扩张不足对复发的影响。
Circulation. 2004 Mar 9;109(9):1085-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121327.67756.19. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
8
Mechanisms of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: intravascular ultrasound analysis.药物洗脱支架置入后支架内再狭窄的机制:血管内超声分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb 1;4(1):9-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.940320. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
9
Standardized angiographically guided over-dilatation of stents using high pressure technique optimize results without increasing risks.使用高压技术在血管造影引导下对支架进行标准化的过度扩张可优化治疗效果且不增加风险。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 May;14(5):221-6.
10
Optimal final lumen area and predictors of target lesion revascularization after stent implantation in small coronary arteries.小冠状动脉支架植入术后的最佳最终管腔面积及靶病变血运重建的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Nov 15;92(10):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.07.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Two Different Strategies of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Routine versus Selective.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间两种不同血管内超声引导策略的比较:常规与选择性。
Korean Circ J. 2013 May;43(5):293-4. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.5.293.