Kemp Andrew H, Hopkinson Patrick J, Hermens Daniel F, Rowe Donald L, Sumich Alexander L, Clark C Richard, Drinkenburg Wilhelmus, Abdi Nadia, Penrose Rebecca, McFarlane Alexander, Boyce Philip, Gordon Evian, Williams Leanne M
Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Australia.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):602-14. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20528.
Attentional impairment in depression is a cardinal feature of depression and has been proposed as a candidate endophenotype for major depressive disorder. Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by oddball signal detection tasks provide objective markers of selective stimulus processing, and are pertinent endophenotypic markers for depression. While previous studies have sought to determine objective markers for attentional impairment in depression, evidence is inconsistent and may involve heterogeneity in relatively small samples. Here, we brought together oddball ERP recording with source localization of neural correlates of selective attention in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 78) and participants with depressed mood (PDM; n = 127) relative to healthy controls (CTL; n = 116). The key finding was a dimensional exaggeration of the P200 (140-270 ms) to both target (signal) and non-target (noise) stimuli, most pronounced in MDD, followed by PDM, relative to CTL. This exaggeration was coupled with slower and more variable response times, suggesting that neural systems are attempting to compensate for a difficulty in discriminating signal from noise. P200 alterations were localised to limbic (hippocampal), temporal and ventral prefrontal regions, key components of the signal detection network. A subsequent reduction and delay in the P300 was also revealed for MDD indicating that the pronounced lack of discrimination in clinical depression may also lead to impaired stimulus evaluation. This P200 increase in depression could provide a potential mechanism for the attentional impairment frequently observed in depression and consequent alterations in the P300 may differentiate clinically significant depression.
抑郁症中的注意力损害是抑郁症的一个主要特征,并已被提议作为重度抑郁症的候选内表型。由异常球信号检测任务诱发的事件相关电位(ERP)提供了选择性刺激处理的客观指标,是抑郁症相关的内表型标志物。虽然先前的研究试图确定抑郁症中注意力损害的客观指标,但证据并不一致,可能涉及相对较小样本中的异质性。在这里,我们将异常球ERP记录与重度抑郁症门诊患者(MDD;n = 78)和情绪低落参与者(PDM;n = 127)相对于健康对照组(CTL;n = 116)的选择性注意力神经关联源定位相结合。关键发现是,相对于CTL,P200(140 - 270毫秒)对目标(信号)和非目标(噪声)刺激均有维度夸大,在MDD中最为明显,其次是PDM。这种夸大伴随着更慢且更具变化性的反应时间,表明神经系统正试图补偿区分信号与噪声的困难。P200改变定位于边缘(海马体)、颞叶和腹侧前额叶区域,这些是信号检测网络的关键组成部分。还发现MDD患者随后P300降低且延迟,这表明临床抑郁症中明显的辨别能力缺失也可能导致刺激评估受损。抑郁症中这种P200增加可能为抑郁症中经常观察到的注意力损害提供一种潜在机制,而P300随后的改变可能区分具有临床意义的抑郁症。