Gomez Manuel, Cartotto Robert, Knighton Judy, Smith Karen, Fish Joel S
Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):130-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815f6efd.
Since January 1999, changes in the management of acute burn patients at a regional adult burn center included no hydrotherapy, blood sparing surgical techniques, a restrictive blood transfusion strategy, newer protective modes of mechanical ventilation, aggressive surgical wound excision, temporary wound closure with allograft skin, employment of advanced critical care trained nurses, and an increased number of dedicated full-time fellowship-trained burn surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the composite effect of these modifications on burn patients' survival. A retrospective hospital chart review was conducted among adult burn patients admitted during a 10-year period (1996-2005). Patients were stratified in two time periods: PAST (1996-1998) and RECENT (1999-2005). RECENT patients were selected by matching age, gender, total body surface area burn, full thickness burn, and presence of inhalation injury with PAST patients. All values are mean +/- SD. Student's t-test and chi2 analysis were performed accordingly with a P < .05 considered significant. Of 1569 acute burn patients admitted between 1996 and 2005, 96 (6%) were excluded because they received comfort measures only. Of the remaining 1473 patients, 684 patients (PAST = 342, RECENT = 342) were selected by the matching criteria. More RECENT patients required mechanical ventilation (25% vs 17%, P = .011), with a trend toward more prolonged duration (9 vs 11.5 days, P = .175), more escharotomies (9.6% vs 5.6%, P = .036), more operations (1.1 vs 0.8, P = .003), and more temporary allograft skin (10% vs 2%, P < .001) than did PAST patients. RECENT patients had lower mortality than did PAST patients (2.3% vs 5.6%, P = .048), specifically patients aged 60 or older (5.4% vs 25.5%, P = .004), patients with TBSA lower than 20% (1% vs 3.9%, P = .031), patients on mechanical ventilation (9.3% vs 27.6%, P = .006), and patients who had surgery (2.6% vs 7.3%, P = .032). The significant decrease in burn patient's mortality was likely due to the composite effects of improvements in clinical care between the two time periods.
自1999年1月起,某地区成人烧伤中心对急性烧伤患者的管理发生了变化,包括不进行水疗、采用血液保护手术技术、限制性输血策略、更新的机械通气保护模式、积极的手术伤口切除、用同种异体皮肤进行临时伤口闭合、聘用经过高级重症护理培训的护士,以及增加了经过专门全日制 fellowship 培训的烧伤外科医生数量。本研究的目的是确定这些改进措施对烧伤患者生存率的综合影响。对10年期间(1996 - 2005年)收治的成人烧伤患者进行了回顾性医院病历审查。患者被分为两个时间段:过去(1996 - 1998年)和近期(1999 - 2005年)。通过将年龄、性别、烧伤总面积、全层烧伤以及是否存在吸入性损伤与过去的患者进行匹配来选择近期的患者。所有数值均为平均值±标准差。相应地进行了学生t检验和卡方分析,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。在1996年至2005年期间收治的1569例急性烧伤患者中,96例(6%)因仅接受了安慰措施而被排除。在其余1473例患者中,根据匹配标准选择了684例患者(过去组 = 342例,近期组 = 342例)。与过去组患者相比,近期组更多患者需要机械通气(25%对17%,P = 0.011),且有机械通气时间延长的趋势(9天对11.5天,P = 0.175),更多患者进行了焦痂切开术(9.6%对5.6%,P = 0.036),更多手术(1.1次对0.8次,P = 0.003),以及更多的临时同种异体皮肤使用(10%对2%,P < 0.001)。近期组患者的死亡率低于过去组患者(2.3%对5.6%,P = 0.048),特别是60岁及以上的患者(5.4%对25.5%,P = 0.004)、烧伤总面积低于20%的患者(1%对