Kakuda Wataru, Lansberg Maarten G, Thijs Vincent N, Kemp Stephanie M, Bammer Roland, Wechsler Lawrence R, Moseley Michael E, Marks Michael P, Albers Gregory W
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 May;28(5):887-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600604. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
Although the perfusion-weighted imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging (PWI/DWI) mismatch model has been proposed to identify acute stroke patients who benefit from reperfusion therapy, the optimal definition of a mismatch is uncertain. We evaluated the odds ratio for a favorable clinical response in mismatch patients with reperfusion compared with no reperfusion for various mismatch ratio thresholds in patients enrolled in the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. A mismatch ratio of 2.6 provided the highest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (83%) for identifying patients in whom reperfusion was associated with a favorable response. Defining mismatch with a larger PWI/DWI ratio may provide greater power for detecting beneficial effects of reperfusion.
尽管灌注加权成像/扩散加权成像(PWI/DWI)不匹配模型已被提出用于识别能从再灌注治疗中获益的急性卒中患者,但不匹配的最佳定义尚不确定。在参与“扩散与灌注成像评估以了解卒中演变(DEFUSE)研究”的患者中,我们评估了不同不匹配率阈值下,与未进行再灌注的不匹配患者相比,进行再灌注的不匹配患者出现良好临床反应的比值比。不匹配率为2.6时,对于识别再灌注与良好反应相关的患者具有最高的敏感性(90%)和特异性(83%)。用更大的PWI/DWI比值定义不匹配可能为检测再灌注的有益效果提供更大的效能。