Virsu Veijo, Oksanen-Hennah Henna, Vedenpää Anita, Jaatinen Pentti, Lahti-Nuuttila Pekka
Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, POBox 9, Siltavuorenpenger 20 D, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(4):525-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1254-z. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
Latencies of sensory neurons vary depending on stimulus variables such as intensity, contrast, distance and adaptation. Therefore, different parts of an object and simultaneous environmental events could often elicit non-simultaneous neural representations. However, despite the neural discrepancies of timing, our actions and object perceptions are usually veridical. Recent results suggest that this temporal veridicality is assisted by the so-called simultaneity constancy which actively compensates for neural timing asynchronies. We studied whether a corresponding compensation by simultaneity constancy could be learned in natural interaction with the environment without explicit feedback. Brief stimuli, whose objective simultaneity/non-simultaneity was judged, consisted of flashes, clicks or touches, and their cross-modal combinations. The stimuli were presented as two concurrent trains. Twenty-eight adult participants practised unimodal (visual, auditory and tactile) and cross-modal (audiovisual, audiotactile and visuotactile) simultaneity judgement tasks in eight sessions, two sessions per week. Effects of practice were tested 7 months later. All tasks indicated improved judgements of simultaneity that were also long-lasting. This simultaneity learning did not affect relative temporal resolution (Weber fraction). Transfer of learning between practised tasks was minimal, which suggests that simultaneity learning mechanisms are not centralised but modally specific. Our results suggest that natural perceptual learning can generate simultaneity-constancy-like phenomena in a well-differentiated and long-lasting manner and concomitantly in several sensory systems. Hebbian learning can explain how experience with environmental simultaneity and non-simultaneity can develop the veridicality of perceived synchrony.
感觉神经元的潜伏期会因刺激变量(如强度、对比度、距离和适应性)而有所不同。因此,物体的不同部分以及同时发生的环境事件常常会引发非同时性的神经表征。然而,尽管存在神经时间差异,但我们的行动和物体感知通常是如实的。最近的研究结果表明,这种时间如实性得益于所谓的同时性恒常性,它能积极补偿神经时间异步性。我们研究了在与环境的自然交互中,无需明确反馈,是否可以通过同时性恒常性进行相应的补偿学习。被判断其客观同时性/非同时性的简短刺激包括闪光、点击或触摸,以及它们的跨模态组合。这些刺激以两个并发序列呈现。28名成年参与者在八个阶段练习单模态(视觉、听觉和触觉)和跨模态(视听、听触觉和视触觉)同时性判断任务,每周两个阶段。7个月后测试练习效果。所有任务均表明同时性判断得到改善,且这种改善具有持久性。这种同时性学习并未影响相对时间分辨率(韦伯分数)。练习任务之间的学习迁移极小,这表明同时性学习机制并非集中式的,而是模态特异性的。我们的研究结果表明,自然感知学习能够以一种分化良好且持久的方式,在多个感觉系统中同时产生类似同时性恒常性的现象。赫布学习可以解释与环境同时性和非同时性的经验如何发展出感知同步的如实性。